[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] common: usb_storage : Implement logic to calculate optimal usb maximum trasfer blocks

Rajesh Bhagat rajesh.bhagat at nxp.com
Thu Jun 9 05:16:00 CEST 2016



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marex at denx.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 7:25 PM
> To: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat at nxp.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Cc: sjg at chromium.org; york sun <york.sun at nxp.com>; Sriram Dash
> <sriram.dash at nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] common: usb_storage : Implement logic to calculate optimal
> usb maximum trasfer blocks
> 
> On 06/08/2016 06:09 AM, Rajesh Bhagat wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marex at denx.de]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 8:38 AM
> >> To: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat at nxp.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> >> Cc: sjg at chromium.org; york sun <york.sun at nxp.com>; Sriram Dash
> >> <sriram.dash at nxp.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] common: usb_storage : Implement logic to
> >> calculate optimal usb maximum trasfer blocks
> >>
> >> On 06/07/2016 11:29 AM, Rajesh Bhagat wrote:
> >>> Implements the logic to calculate the optimal usb maximum trasfer
> >>> blocks instead of sending USB_MAX_XFER_BLK blocks which is 65535 and
> >>> 20 in case of EHCI and other USB protocols respectively.
> >>>
> >>> It defines USB_MIN_XFER_BLK/USB_MAX_XFER_BLK trasfer blocks that
> >>> should be checked for success starting from minimum to maximum, and
> >>> rest of the read/write are performed with that optimal value. It
> >>> tries to increase/ decrease the blocks in follwing scenarios:
> >>>
> >>> 1.decrease blocks: when read/write for a particular number of blocks
> >>> fails.
> >>> 2. increase blocks: when read/write for a particular number of
> >>> blocks pass and amount left to trasfer is greater than current
> >>> number of blocks.
> >>>
> >>> Currently changes are done for EHCI where min = 4096 and max = 65535
> >>> is taken. And for other cases code is left unchanged by keeping min
> >>> = max = 20.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash at nxp.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat at nxp.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> Changes in v3:
> >>>  - Adds cur_xfer_blks in struct usb_device to retain values
> >>>  - Adds functions dec/inc_cur_xfer_blks to remove code duplication
> >>>  - Moves check from macro to calling functions
> >>>
> >>> Changes in v2:
> >>>  - Removes table to store blocks and use formula (1 << (12 + n)) - 1
> >>>  - Adds logic to start from minimum, go to maximum in each
> >>> read/write
> >>>
> >>>  common/usb_storage.c | 78
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >>>  include/usb.h        |  1 +
> >>>  2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/common/usb_storage.c b/common/usb_storage.c index
> >>> 7e6e52d..e08dcd4 100644
> >>> --- a/common/usb_storage.c
> >>> +++ b/common/usb_storage.c
> >>> @@ -106,11 +106,40 @@ struct us_data {
> >>>   * enough free heap space left, but the SCSI READ(10) and WRITE(10)
> >>> commands
> >> are
> >>>   * limited to 65535 blocks.
> >>>   */
> >>> +#define USB_MIN_XFER_BLK	4095
> >>>  #define USB_MAX_XFER_BLK	65535
> >>>  #else
> >>> +#define USB_MIN_XFER_BLK	20
> >>>  #define USB_MAX_XFER_BLK	20
> >>>  #endif
> >>>
> >>> +#define GET_CUR_XFER_BLKS(blks)	(LOG2(blks / (USB_MIN_XFER_BLK +
> >> 1)))
> >>> +#define CALC_CUR_XFER_BLKS(pos)	((1 << (12 + pos)) - 1)
> >>> +
> >>> +static int dec_cur_xfer_blks(int *pos, unsigned short *smallblks) {
> >>> +	/* decrease the cur_xfer_blks */
> >>> +	unsigned short size = (*pos > 0) ? CALC_CUR_XFER_BLKS(*pos - 1) :
> >>> +0;
> >>
> >
> > Hello Marek,
> >
> >> If someone passes null pointer into the function, it will fail.
> >> Also, you can refactor it to make it more readable:
> >>
> >> if (!pos)
> >>  return -EINVAL;
> >> if (size < USB_MIN_XFER_BLK)
> >>  return -EINVAL;
> >> ... do stuff ...
> >>
> >
> > Refactoring the code to return early in case of error conditions is
> > fine. But pos and smallblks can never be passed as NULL in these functions.
> 
Hello Marek,

> ... until an idiot comes around and does it.
> 

Ok, I will add the mentioned sanity checks in v4.

> >> I still don't understand why $pos isn't unsigned int, it should be.
> >>
> >
> > I believe keeping a variable as "int" provides a natural way of
> > checking for overflow conditions. We check can check if number has
> > become negative and take actions, which is not possible when number is taken as
> "unsigned int".
> 
> But the number here can never be negative, can it ?

Ok, I will change the variable to unsigned int in v4. 

> 
> >>> +	if (size >= USB_MIN_XFER_BLK) {
> >>> +		*smallblks = size;
> >>> +		(*pos)--;
> >>> +		return 0;
> >>> +	}
> >>> +	return -EINVAL;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static int inc_cur_xfer_blks(int *pos, unsigned short *smallblks,
> >>> +lbaint_t blks) {
> >>> +	/* try to increase the cur_xfer_blks */
> >>> +	unsigned short size = (*pos >= 0) ? CALC_CUR_XFER_BLKS(*pos + 1) :
> 0;
> >>> +	if (size <= blks && size <= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK) {
> >>> +		*smallblks = size;
> >>> +		(*pos)++;
> >>> +		return 0;
> >>> +	}
> >>> +	return -EINVAL;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>>  #ifndef CONFIG_BLK
> >>>  static struct us_data usb_stor[USB_MAX_STOR_DEV];  #endif @@
> >>> -1117,7
> >>> +1146,8 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_read(struct blk_desc
> >>> +*block_dev,
> >> lbaint_t blknr,
> >>>  	unsigned short smallblks;
> >>>  	struct usb_device *udev;
> >>>  	struct us_data *ss;
> >>> -	int retry;
> >>> +	int retry, pos;
> >>> +	bool retry_flag = false;
> >>>  	ccb *srb = &usb_ccb;
> >>>  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK
> >>>  	struct blk_desc *block_dev;
> >>> @@ -1145,6 +1175,7 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_read(struct
> >>> blk_desc
> >> *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
> >>>  	buf_addr = (uintptr_t)buffer;
> >>>  	start = blknr;
> >>>  	blks = blkcnt;
> >>> +	pos = GET_CUR_XFER_BLKS(udev->cur_xfer_blks);
> >>
> >> Is this $pos even needed ? Why ?
> >
> > $pos variable is updated in dec/inc_cur_xfer_blks functions which
> > calculates the next transfer blocks, and finally when all conditions are met is stored
> in udev->cur_xfer_blks.
> 
> And why doesn't this work with udev->cur_xfer_blks directly ?
> 

Let me try to check if we can work without this in v4. 

> >>
> >>>  	debug("\nusb_read: dev %d startblk " LBAF ", blccnt " LBAF " buffer %"
> >>>  	      PRIxPTR "\n", block_dev->devnum, start, blks, buf_addr); @@
> >>> -1153,26 +1184,35 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_read(struct
> >>> blk_desc
> >> *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
> >>>  		/* XXX need some comment here */
> >>>  		retry = 2;
> >>>  		srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
> >>> -		if (blks > USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> >>> -			smallblks = USB_MAX_XFER_BLK;
> >>> +		if (blks > udev->cur_xfer_blks)
> >>> +			smallblks = udev->cur_xfer_blks;
> >>>  		else
> >>>  			smallblks = (unsigned short) blks;
> >>>  retry_it:
> >>> -		if (smallblks == USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> >>> +		debug("usb_read: retry #%d, cur_xfer_blks %hu, smallblks
> %hu\n",
> >>> +		      retry, udev->cur_xfer_blks, smallblks);
> >>> +		if (smallblks == udev->cur_xfer_blks)
> >>>  			usb_show_progress();
> >>>  		srb->datalen = block_dev->blksz * smallblks;
> >>>  		srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
> >>>  		if (usb_read_10(srb, ss, start, smallblks)) {
> >>>  			debug("Read ERROR\n");
> >>>  			usb_request_sense(srb, ss);
> >>> -			if (retry--)
> >>> +			if (retry--) {
> >>> +				if (!dec_cur_xfer_blks(&pos, &smallblks))
> >>> +					udev->cur_xfer_blks = smallblks;
> >>> +				retry_flag = true;
> >>>  				goto retry_it;
> >>> +			}
> >>>  			blkcnt -= blks;
> >>
> >> The same piece of code is below. I would rather see you factor out
> >> the common code and then make any changes.
> >>
> >
> > IMHO, All the common code is moved in functions dec/inc_cur_xfer_blks as pointed
> earlier.
> > Are you are referring to other common code of usb_stor_read/write
> > functions which is not part of this patchset. If yes, I would prefer to take it as a next
> patch set.
> 
> Please don't add new stuff to code which needs fixing first, that's not a good practice.
> Prepare the ground first and then add new stuff.
> 

Let me give it a try to make common function for usb_stor_read/write in v4. 

Best Regards,
Rajesh Bhagat 

> > Best Regards,
> > Rajesh Bhagat
> >
> >>>  			break;
> >>>  		}
> >>>  		start += smallblks;
> >>>  		blks -= smallblks;
> >>>  		buf_addr += srb->datalen;
> >>> +
> >>> +		if (!retry_flag && !inc_cur_xfer_blks(&pos, &smallblks, blks))
> >>> +			udev->cur_xfer_blks = smallblks;
> >>>  	} while (blks != 0);
> >>>  	ss->flags &= ~USB_READY;
> >>>
> >>> @@ -1181,7 +1221,7 @@ retry_it:
> >>>  	      start, smallblks, buf_addr);
> >>>
> >>>  	usb_disable_asynch(0); /* asynch transfer allowed */
> >>> -	if (blkcnt >= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> >>> +	if (blkcnt >= udev->cur_xfer_blks)
> >>>  		debug("\n");
> >>>  	return blkcnt;
> >>>  }
> >>> @@ -1199,7 +1239,8 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_write(struct
> >>> blk_desc
> >> *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
> >>>  	unsigned short smallblks;
> >>>  	struct usb_device *udev;
> >>>  	struct us_data *ss;
> >>> -	int retry;
> >>> +	int retry, pos;
> >>> +	bool retry_flag = false;
> >>>  	ccb *srb = &usb_ccb;
> >>>  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK
> >>>  	struct blk_desc *block_dev;
> >>> @@ -1222,6 +1263,7 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_write(struct
> >>> blk_desc
> >> *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
> >>>  	}
> >>>  #endif
> >>>  	ss = (struct us_data *)udev->privptr;
> >>> +	pos = GET_CUR_XFER_BLKS(udev->cur_xfer_blks);
> >>>
> >>>  	usb_disable_asynch(1); /* asynch transfer not allowed */
> >>>
> >>> @@ -1239,26 +1281,35 @@ static unsigned long usb_stor_write(struct
> >>> blk_desc
> >> *block_dev, lbaint_t blknr,
> >>>  		 */
> >>>  		retry = 2;
> >>>  		srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
> >>> -		if (blks > USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> >>> -			smallblks = USB_MAX_XFER_BLK;
> >>> +		if (blks > udev->cur_xfer_blks)
> >>> +			smallblks = udev->cur_xfer_blks;
> >>>  		else
> >>>  			smallblks = (unsigned short) blks;
> >>>  retry_it:
> >>> -		if (smallblks == USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> >>> +		debug("usb_write: retry #%d, cur_xfer_blks %hu, smallblks
> %hu\n",
> >>> +		      retry, udev->cur_xfer_blks, smallblks);
> >>> +		if (smallblks == udev->cur_xfer_blks)
> >>>  			usb_show_progress();
> >>>  		srb->datalen = block_dev->blksz * smallblks;
> >>>  		srb->pdata = (unsigned char *)buf_addr;
> >>>  		if (usb_write_10(srb, ss, start, smallblks)) {
> >>>  			debug("Write ERROR\n");
> >>>  			usb_request_sense(srb, ss);
> >>> -			if (retry--)
> >>> +			if (retry--) {
> >>> +				if (!dec_cur_xfer_blks(&pos, &smallblks))
> >>> +					udev->cur_xfer_blks = smallblks;
> >>> +				retry_flag = true;
> >>>  				goto retry_it;
> >>> +			}
> >>>  			blkcnt -= blks;
> >>>  			break;
> >>>  		}
> >>>  		start += smallblks;
> >>>  		blks -= smallblks;
> >>>  		buf_addr += srb->datalen;
> >>> +
> >>> +		if (!retry_flag && !inc_cur_xfer_blks(&pos, &smallblks, blks))
> >>> +			udev->cur_xfer_blks = smallblks;
> >>>  	} while (blks != 0);
> >>>  	ss->flags &= ~USB_READY;
> >>>
> >>> @@ -1266,7 +1317,7 @@ retry_it:
> >>>  	      PRIxPTR "\n", start, smallblks, buf_addr);
> >>>
> >>>  	usb_disable_asynch(0); /* asynch transfer allowed */
> >>> -	if (blkcnt >= USB_MAX_XFER_BLK)
> >>> +	if (blkcnt >= udev->cur_xfer_blks)
> >>>  		debug("\n");
> >>>  	return blkcnt;
> >>>
> >>> @@ -1331,6 +1382,9 @@ int usb_storage_probe(struct usb_device *dev,
> >>> unsigned
> >> int ifnum,
> >>>  		break;
> >>>  	}
> >>>
> >>> +	/* Initialize the current transfer blocks to minimum value */
> >>> +	dev->cur_xfer_blks = USB_MIN_XFER_BLK;
> >>> +
> >>>  	/*
> >>>  	 * We are expecting a minimum of 2 endpoints - in and out (bulk).
> >>>  	 * An optional interrupt is OK (necessary for CBI protocol).
> >>> diff --git a/include/usb.h b/include/usb.h index 02a0ccd..bd49014
> >>> 100644
> >>> --- a/include/usb.h
> >>> +++ b/include/usb.h
> >>> @@ -153,6 +153,7 @@ struct usb_device {
> >>>  	struct udevice *dev;		/* Pointer to associated device */
> >>>  	struct udevice *controller_dev;	/* Pointer to associated controller */
> >>>  #endif
> >>> +	unsigned short cur_xfer_blks;	/* Current maximum transfer blocks */
> >>>  };
> >>>
> >>>  struct int_queue;
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >> Marek Vasut
> 
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut


More information about the U-Boot mailing list