[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] sunxi: Support booting from SPI flash

Siarhei Siamashka siarhei.siamashka at gmail.com
Fri Jun 10 06:28:31 CEST 2016


On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 19:42:55 -0700
Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On 9 June 2016 at 18:33, Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 17:36:10 -0700
> > Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> >  
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 7 June 2016 at 05:28, Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka at gmail.com> wrote:  
> >> > Allwinner devices support SPI flash as one of the possible
> >> > bootable media type. The SPI flash chip needs to be connected
> >> > to SPI0 pins (port C) to make this work. More information is
> >> > available at:
> >> >
> >> >     https://linux-sunxi.org/Bootable_SPI_flash
> >> >
> >> > This patch adds the initial support for booting from SPI flash.
> >> > The existing SPI frameworks are not used in order to reduce the
> >> > SPL code size. Right now the SPL size grows by ~370 bytes when
> >> > CONFIG_SPL_SPI_SUNXI option is enabled.
> >> >
> >> > While there are no popular Allwinner devices with SPI flash at
> >> > the moment, testing can be done using a SPI flash module (it
> >> > can be bought for ~2$ on ebay) and jumper wires with the boards,
> >> > which expose relevant pins on the expansion header. The SPI flash
> >> > chips themselves are very cheap (some prices are even listed as
> >> > low as 4 cents) and should not cost much if somebody decides to
> >> > design a development board with an SPI flash chip soldered on
> >> > the PCB.
> >> >
> >> > Another nice feature of the SPI flash is that it can be safely
> >> > accessed in a device-independent way (since we know that the
> >> > boot ROM is already probing these pins during the boot time).
> >> > And if, for example, Olimex boards opted to use SPI flash instead
> >> > of EEPROM, then they would have been able to have U-Boot installed
> >> > in the SPI flash now and boot the rest of the system from the SATA
> >> > hard drive. Hopefully we may see new interesting Allwinner based
> >> > development boards in the future, now that the software support
> >> > for the SPI flash is in a better shape :-)
> >> >
> >> > Testing can be done by enabling the CONFIG_SPL_SPI_SUNXI option
> >> > in a board defconfig, then building U-Boot and finally flashing
> >> > the resulting u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin binary over USB OTG with
> >> > a help of the sunxi-fel tool:
> >> >
> >> >    sunxi-fel spiflash-write 0 u-boot-sunxi-with-spl.bin
> >> >
> >> > The device needs to be switched into FEL (USB recovery) mode first.
> >> > The most suitable boards for testing are Orange Pi PC and Pine64.
> >> > Because these boards are cheap, have no built-in NAND/eMMC and
> >> > expose SPI0 pins on the Raspberry Pi compatible expansion header.
> >> > The A13-OLinuXino-Micro board also can be used.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka at gmail.com>
> >> > ---
> >> >
> >> > Changes in v2:
> >> >  - Add Kconfig option (CONFIG_SPL_SPI_SUNXI) and move the SPI flash
> >> >    support code into a separate source file
> >> >  - Use CONFIG_SYS_SPI_U_BOOT_OFFS instead of the hardcoded constant
> >> >  - Deinitialize the SPI controller and undo pin muxing after the job
> >> >    is done
> >> >  - Size reduction of the SPI transfer function
> >> >  - Add delay after each SPI transfer to ensure that the chip select
> >> >    deassert timing requirements (tSHSL) are always satisfied
> >> >  - More comments in the code
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/gpio.h |   3 +
> >> >  arch/arm/mach-sunxi/board.c            |   5 +
> >> >  common/spl/spl.c                       |   4 +-
> >> >  drivers/mtd/spi/Kconfig                |  12 ++
> >> >  drivers/mtd/spi/Makefile               |   1 +
> >> >  drivers/mtd/spi/sunxi_spi_spl.c        | 283 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >  include/configs/sunxi-common.h         |   5 +
> >> >  7 files changed, 311 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> >  create mode 100644 drivers/mtd/spi/sunxi_spi_spl.c  
> >>
> >> Shouldn't this be a normal SPI driver? Then you could put this in
> >> common/spl/spl_spi.c.  
> >
> > This source file contains both a sunxi SPI controller support and a
> > basic SPI flash read functionality glued together for size reduction
> > purposes.
> >
> > We are interested in implementing the "spl_spi_load_image()" function,
> > because this is what gets called when handling the BOOT_DEVICE_SPI
> > case.
> >
> > The "drivers/mtd/spi" directory contains the "spi_spl_load.c" file,
> > which implements this particular function with the help of the generic
> > SPI flash support code from "spi_flash.c" and the generic SPI bus
> > support provided by the code from the "drivers/spi" directory.
> >
> > What I'm doing in this patch is an implementation of a size reduced
> > sunxi-specific replacement for "spi_spl_load.c". But in U-Boot proper
> > (where the code size is not a problem anymore) we will need a real
> > sunxi SPI driver.  
> 
> OK I see, fair enough.
> 
> Do you know how much space this saves? I'm actually not sure how much
> overhead the SPI flash layer adds.

I don't have a DM based SPI driver for sunxi yet. But I tried to
disable SPI flash on some other boards and check the SPL size
reduction. I don't remember what kind of board it was before, but
the size was reduced by several kilobytes. Now tried it again with
the "spring_defconfig" build:

== normal build ==

   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
  11796	   1260	      0	  13056	   3300	spl/u-boot-spl

== spi flash disabled ==

   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
   6812	   1052	      0	   7864	   1eb8	spl/u-boot-spl

My changes in "include/configs/exynos5-dt-common.h" to disable SPI
flash:

-#define CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_SPI_FLASH
+#define CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC
+/*
 #define CONFIG_ENV_SPI_BASE    0x12D30000
 #define FLASH_SIZE             (4 << 20)
 #define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET      (FLASH_SIZE - CONFIG_ENV_SECT_SIZE)
 #define CONFIG_SPI_BOOTING
+*/

Yes, this was not a very clean experiment. But still ~5K looks
significantly larger than ~400 bytes.


For comparison, building "Cubieboard_defconfig" from the current
master branch (6b3943f1b04be60f147ee540fbd72c4c7ea89f80) results
in the following SPL sizes, depending on the GCC version:

=== GCC 4.7 ===
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
  21743	    640	    256	  22639	   586f	spl/u-boot-spl

=== GCC 4.9 ===
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
  21667	    640	    256	  22563	   5823	spl/u-boot-spl

=== GCC 5.3 ===
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
  21571	    640	    256	  22467	   57c3	spl/u-boot-spl

=== GCC 6.1 ===
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
  18406	    640	    256	  19302	   4b66	spl/u-boot-spl

Please note that NAND and FIT are still not enabled, though
CONFIG_USE_TINY_PRINTF is not enabled either. And 24 KiB is
the size limit for the SPL, enforced by the boot ROM.

-- 
Regards,
Sierž


More information about the U-Boot mailing list