[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/9] libfdt: Add new headers and defines

[David Gibson]

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 05:03:36PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
> 
> > On May 27, 2016, at 12:13 , Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > 
> > The libfdt overlay support introduces a bunch of new includes and
> > functions.
> > 
> > Make sure we are able to build it by adding the needed glue.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> > include/libfdt_env.h | 7 +++++++
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/libfdt_env.h b/include/libfdt_env.h
> > index 273b5d30f867..2d2196031332 100644
> > --- a/include/libfdt_env.h
> > +++ b/include/libfdt_env.h
> > @@ -23,6 +23,13 @@ typedef __be64 fdt64_t;
> > #define fdt64_to_cpu(x)		be64_to_cpu(x)
> > #define cpu_to_fdt64(x)		cpu_to_be64(x)
> > 
> > +#ifdef __UBOOT__
> > +#include "malloc.h"
> > +#include "vsprintf.h"
> > +
> > +#define strtol(cp, endp, base)	simple_strtol(cp, endp, base)
> > +#endif
> > +
> > /* adding a ramdisk needs 0x44 bytes in version 2008.10 */
> > #define FDT_RAMDISK_OVERHEAD	0x80
> > 
> 
> We need to figure out what the upstream libfdt/dtc maintainer’s take is on this is.
> For u-boot we’re fine and for now it’s OK.

These were sent to the upstream dtc list as well.

The concept is fine, but there are a number of problems in the
implementation.  I sent detailed review comments on the upstream
versions, haven't seen a respin yet.
-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20160611/8742d1bb/attachment.sig>