[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v1] usb: spl: fix USB errata for FSL SPL targets
york sun
york.sun at nxp.com
Wed Jun 29 06:12:39 CEST 2016
On 06/28/2016 08:53 PM, Sriram Dash wrote:
>> From: york sun
>> On 06/28/2016 12:02 AM, Sriram Dash wrote:
>>>> From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marex at denx.de] On 06/28/2016 01:02 AM, York
>>>> Sun wrote:
>>>>> Commit 9262367 moved USB errata workaround to a C file but didn't
>>>>> build it for SPL targets.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: York Sun <york.sun at nxp.com>
>>>>> CC: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash at nxp.com>
>>>>> CC: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat at nxp.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Please review this patch. It fixed the compiling errors introduced
>>>>> by 9262367. Not sure if this is the way USB errata should be handled.
>>>>>
>>>>> drivers/Makefile | 7 +++++++
>>>>> drivers/usb/common/Makefile | 8 ++++++--
>>>>> include/configs/km/kmp204x-common.h | 1 +
>>>>> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/Makefile b/drivers/Makefile index
>>>>> 1723958..88774ba 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/Makefile
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/Makefile
>>>>> @@ -39,6 +39,13 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_USB_PHY) += usb/phy/
>>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_SATA_SUPPORT) += block/
>>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_HOST_SUPPORT) += block/
>>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT) += block/
>>>>> +ifdef CONFIG_USB_EHCI_FSL
>>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_USB_ERRATA = y
>>>>> +endif
>>>>> +ifdef CONFIG_USB_XHCI_FSL
>>>>> +CONFIG_SPL_USB_ERRATA = y
>>>>> +endif
>>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_ERRATA) += usb/common/
>>>>
>>>> I really dislike the naming here, I'd say just do
>>>>
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_USB_EHCI_FSL) += usb/common/
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_FSL) += usb/common/
>>
>> Better.
>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hello York/Marek,
>>>
>>> IMO, the build for SPL is failing in PPC as the cmd_errata is not
>>> getting the definition of the has_erratum_aNNNNNN functions. So,
>>> instead of EHCI or XHCI flags, i think we can use CONFIG_CMD_ERRATA
>>> for SPL build for the errata applicability.
>>>
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_ERRATA) += usb/common/fsl-errata.o
>>>
>>> What is your opinion?
>>>
>>
>> Sriram,
>>
>> I think it is not a good idea. CONFIG_CMD_ERRATA has nothing to do with USB
>> errata specifically. It means to enable the command "errata", and nothing more.
>>
>> What's broken here is the mechanism to detect if an erratum applies to a particular
>> SoC version. Before your change, the functions were included from the header file.
>> You moved those functions into a C file. That's fine. We need to build this file for
>> both normal image and SPL. I don't think the workarounds are optional, unless USB
>> is not used at all for SPL.
>>
>> I think Marek's comments make sense.
>> 1) obj-$(CONFIG_USB_EHCI_FSL) += usb/common/
>> obj-$(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_FSL) += usb/common/
>
> OK. This looks generic also.
If an SoC has the errata, it should implement the workaround, regardless
if the U-Boot uses USB. Kernel may use it later. So we should treat it
that way.
>
>> For this to work, we need to fix
>> kmp204x-common.h, which I noticed CONFIG_USB_EHCI_FSL is not defined. Please
>> examine if this macro should be defined at SoC level, instead of board level.
>
> The kmp204x-common does not need to define CONFIG_USB_EHCI_FSL.
> Currently, the board is not using the USB. But, they are using
> CONFIG_CMD_ERRATA. So, instead of having a flag of CONFIG_USB_EHCI_FSL
> in the board specific file, drivers/usb/common/Makefile should include
> fsl-errata.o for the config CONFIG_CMD_ERRATA. What is your opinion?
I don't agree. CMD_ERRATA is to enable the command to show which erratum
workaround has been implemented. It shouldn't gate if the actual
workaround code runs. Even kmp204x boards doesn't use USB, the
workaround still needs to be implemented, in case kernel uses USB later.
I was suggesting to put a macro in SoC config file if that fits the purpose.
>
>> 2) Use a proper macro for fsl-dt-fixup.o The entry point is fdt_fixup_dr_usb(), which
>> is only called by
>> ft_board_setup() when CONFIG_OF_BOARD_SETUP is defined.
>>
>
> Yes. You are correct. fdt_fixup_dr_usb is only called when CONFIG_OF_BOARD_SETUP
> is defined. So, I guess it will be fine for drivers/usb/common/Makefile
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_USB_EHCI_FSL) += fsl-errata.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_FSL) += fsl-errata.o
> obj-$( CONFIG_CMD_ERRATA) += fsl-errata.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_OF_BOARD_SETUP) += fsl-dt-fixup.o
>
> What is your opinion?
That looks reasonable. Please test some targets with and without SPL,
powerpc and ARM.
York
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list