[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] arm: imx: add i.MX53 Beckhoff CX9020 Embedded PC

Patrick Brünn P.Bruenn at beckhoff.com
Mon Oct 17 13:32:52 CEST 2016


>From: Stefano Babic [mailto:sbabic at denx.de]
>Sent: Montag, 17. Oktober 2016 13:27
Hi Stefano and Jagan,
>
>On 17/10/2016 11:19, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:44 PM,  <linux-kernel-dev at beckhoff.com> wrote:
>>> From: Patrick Bruenn <p.bruenn at beckhoff.com>
>>>
>>> Add CX9020 board based on mx53loco.
>>> Add simplified imx53 base device tree from kernel v4.8-rc8, to reuse
>>> serial_mxc with DTE and prepare for device tree migration of other
>>> functions and imx53 devices.
>>>
>>> The CX9020 differs from i.MX53 Quick Start Board by:
>>> - use uart2 instead of uart1
>>> - DVI-D connector instead of VGA
>>> - no audio
>>> - CCAT FPGA connected to emi
>>> - enable rtc
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Patrick Bruenn <p.bruenn at beckhoff.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - remove #include <asm/errno.h> from mx53cx9020.c
>>> - remove obsolete CONFIG_CMD_CCAT from mx53cx9020.h
>>>
>>>  arch/arm/Kconfig                             |   7 +
>>>  arch/arm/dts/Makefile                        |   2 +
>>>  arch/arm/dts/imx53-cx9020.dts                |  26 ++
>>>  arch/arm/dts/imx53.dtsi                      |  41 ++
>>>  board/beckhoff/mx53cx9020/Kconfig            |  15 +
>>>  board/beckhoff/mx53cx9020/MAINTAINERS        |   6 +
>>>  board/beckhoff/mx53cx9020/Makefile           |   9 +
>>>  board/beckhoff/mx53cx9020/imximage.cfg       |  82 ++++
>>>  board/beckhoff/mx53cx9020/mx53cx9020.c       | 563
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  board/beckhoff/mx53cx9020/mx53cx9020_video.c |  83 ++++
>>>  configs/mx53cx9020_defconfig                 |  19 +
>>>  include/configs/mx53cx9020.h                 | 208 ++++++++++
>>>  12 files changed, 1061 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/imx53-cx9020.dts
>>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/imx53.dtsi
>>>  create mode 100644 board/beckhoff/mx53cx9020/Kconfig
>>>  create mode 100644 board/beckhoff/mx53cx9020/MAINTAINERS
>>>  create mode 100644 board/beckhoff/mx53cx9020/Makefile
>>>  create mode 100644 board/beckhoff/mx53cx9020/imximage.cfg
>>>  create mode 100644 board/beckhoff/mx53cx9020/mx53cx9020.c
>>>  create mode 100644 board/beckhoff/mx53cx9020/mx53cx9020_video.c
>>>  create mode 100644 configs/mx53cx9020_defconfig
>>>  create mode 100644 include/configs/mx53cx9020.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>> index f55d5b2..ece610a 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>>> @@ -480,6 +480,12 @@ config TARGET_MX53LOCO
>>>         bool "Support mx53loco"
>>>         select CPU_V7
>>>
>>> +config TARGET_MX53CX9020
>>> +       bool "Support mx53cx9020"
>>> +       select CPU_V7
>>> +       select DM
>>> +       select DM_SERIAL
>>> +
>>>  config TARGET_MX53SMD
>>>         bool "Support mx53smd"
>>>         select CPU_V7
>>> @@ -965,6 +971,7 @@ source "board/freescale/mx51evk/Kconfig"
>>>  source "board/freescale/mx53ard/Kconfig"
>>>  source "board/freescale/mx53evk/Kconfig"
>>>  source "board/freescale/mx53loco/Kconfig"
>>> +source "board/beckhoff/mx53cx9020/Kconfig"
>>>  source "board/freescale/mx53smd/Kconfig"
>>>  source "board/freescale/s32v234evb/Kconfig"
>>>  source "board/freescale/vf610twr/Kconfig"
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/dts/Makefile
>>> index 04d47e7..3f753ba 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/dts/Makefile
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/Makefile
>>> @@ -286,6 +286,8 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_MX6) += imx6ull-14x14-evk.dtb \
>>>         imx6dl-icore.dtb \
>>>         imx6q-icore.dtb
>>>
>>> +dtb-$(CONFIG_TARGET_MX53CX9020) += imx53-cx9020.dtb
>>
>> This should be MX arch config entry, not the target one.
>
>Yes, thanks Jagan. Please check inside Makefile. You could use
>CONFIG_MX53 for this.
>
I will fix this in v3 (together with the removed CONFIG_DISPLAY_BOARDINFO)
>>> +int board_mmc_init(bd_t *bis)
>>> +{
>>> +       static const iomux_v3_cfg_t sd1_pads[] = {
>>> +               NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_SD1_CMD__ESDHC1_CMD,
>SD_CMD_PAD_CTRL),
>>> +               NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_SD1_CLK__ESDHC1_CLK,
>SD_PAD_CTRL),
>>> +               NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_SD1_DATA0__ESDHC1_DAT0,
>SD_PAD_CTRL),
>>> +               NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_SD1_DATA1__ESDHC1_DAT1,
>SD_PAD_CTRL),
>>> +               NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_SD1_DATA2__ESDHC1_DAT2,
>SD_PAD_CTRL),
>>> +               NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_SD1_DATA3__ESDHC1_DAT3,
>SD_PAD_CTRL),
>>> +               MX53_PAD_GPIO_1__GPIO1_1,
>>> +       };
>>> +
>>> +       static const iomux_v3_cfg_t sd2_pads[] = {
>>> +               NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_SD2_CMD__ESDHC2_CMD,
>SD_CMD_PAD_CTRL),
>>> +               NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_SD2_CLK__ESDHC2_CLK,
>SD_PAD_CTRL),
>>> +               NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_SD2_DATA0__ESDHC2_DAT0,
>SD_PAD_CTRL),
>>> +               NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_SD2_DATA1__ESDHC2_DAT1,
>SD_PAD_CTRL),
>>> +               NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_SD2_DATA2__ESDHC2_DAT2,
>SD_PAD_CTRL),
>>> +               NEW_PAD_CTRL(MX53_PAD_SD2_DATA3__ESDHC2_DAT3,
>SD_PAD_CTRL),
>>> +               MX53_PAD_GPIO_4__GPIO1_4,
>>> +       };
>>
>> Since, it's have dts support please use pinctrl driver for pads and
>> mux atleast for supporting ones.
>
>..but for MX53 this is still missing, right ?
Yes, as stated here:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2016-September/268517.html
I would like to add that in a second patch on top of this.

Regards,
Patrick
--

Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co. KG | Managing Director: Dipl. Phys. Hans Beckhoff
Registered office: Verl, Germany | Register court: Guetersloh HRA 7075




More information about the U-Boot mailing list