[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] armv8/ls1043a: fixup GIC offset according to SVR and SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN[GIC_ADDR_BIT]

york sun york.sun at nxp.com
Tue Oct 25 22:35:21 CEST 2016


On 10/24/2016 12:51 AM, Wenbin song wrote:
> The LS1043A rev1.1 silicon supports two types of GIC offset: 4K alignment
> and 64K alignment. The bit SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN[GIC_ADDR_BIT] is used to choose
> which offset will be used.
>
> The LS1043A rev1.0 silicon only supports the CIG offset with 4K alignment.
>
> If GIC_ADDR_BIT bit is set, 4K alignment is used, or else 64K alignment is used.
> 64K alignment is the default setting.
>
> Overriding the weekly smp_kick_all_cpus, the new impletment is able to detect
> GIC offset.

I think you meant "weak" here. :)

>
> The default GIC offset in kernel device tree is using 64K alignment, it
> need to be fixed if 4K alignment is detected.

The "default" offset in device tree is also created by us, isn't it? I 
am not against you fixing it. Don't you want to check the alignment 
first? If the device tree has 4K alignment but you run on rev 1.1, do 
you want to use 64K alignment?

>
> Signed-off-by: Wenbin Song <wenbin.song at nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu at nxp.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> 	Squash [patch 2/3 v3] with this patch.
> 	Add comments on fix_gic_offest.
> 	Add the descriptions of rev1.0 GIC offset.
> 	Use macros to define the offset and size of GIC components.
> Changes in v3:
> 	Add descriptions about smp_kick_all_cpus on commit message.
> 	Rename the macros on commit message to match with them used in the change.
> 	Replace CONFIG_LS1043A with HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN.
> Changes in v2:
> 	None
> ---
>  arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig          |  4 ++
>  arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c            | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S       | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h  | 20 +++++++-
>  .../include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/immap_lsch2.h  |  3 +-
>  5 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig
> index 94ec8d5..c66c497 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ config ARCH_LS1043A
>  	select SYS_FSL_DDR_VER_50
>  	select SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A010315
>  	select SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A010539
> +	select HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
>
>  config ARCH_LS1046A
>  	bool
> @@ -135,4 +136,7 @@ config SYS_FSL_DDR4
>  	help
>  	  Enable Freescale DDR4 controller.
>
> +config HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
> +       bool
> +
>  endmenu
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c
> index 1a8321b..ebc7863 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c
> @@ -126,6 +126,52 @@ void fsl_fdt_disable_usb(void *blob)
>  	}
>  }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
> +/* Fixup gic node align with 4K */
> +static void fdt_fixup_gic(void *blob)
> +{
> +	int offset, err;
> +	u64 reg[8];
> +	struct ccsr_gur __iomem *gur = (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_GUTS_ADDR);
> +	unsigned int val;
> +	struct ccsr_scfg __iomem *scfg = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SCFG_ADDR;
> +
> +	val = gur_in32(&gur->svr) & 0xff;
> +
> +	if (val == REV1_1) {

This is problematic. How about for future SoCs, or other than LS1043A? 
Can we just check GIC_ADDR_BIT?

> +		val = scfg_in32(&scfg->gic_align) & (0x01 << GIC_ADDR_BIT);
> +		if (!val)
> +			return;
> +	}
> +
> +	offset = fdt_subnode_offset(blob, 0, "interrupt-controller at 1400000");
> +	if (offset < 0) {
> +		printf("WARNING: fdt_subnode_offset can't find node %s: %s\n",
> +		       "interrupt-controller at 1400000", fdt_strerror(offset));
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	reg[0] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICD_BASE_4K);
> +	reg[1] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICD_SIZE_4K);
> +	reg[2] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICC_BASE_4K);
> +	reg[3] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICC_SIZE_4K);
> +	reg[4] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICH_BASE_4K);
> +	reg[5] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICH_SIZE_4K);
> +	reg[6] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICV_BASE_4K);
> +	reg[7] = cpu_to_fdt64(GICV_SIZE_4K);
> +
> +	err = fdt_setprop(blob, offset, "reg", reg, sizeof(reg));
> +	if (err < 0) {
> +		printf("WARNING: fdt_setprop can't set %s from node %s: %s\n",
> +		       "reg", "interrupt-controller at 1400000",
> +		       fdt_strerror(err));
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	return;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  void ft_cpu_setup(void *blob, bd_t *bd)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_FSL_LSCH2
> @@ -170,4 +216,7 @@ void ft_cpu_setup(void *blob, bd_t *bd)
>  #endif
>  	fsl_fdt_disable_usb(blob);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
> +	fdt_fixup_gic(blob);
> +#endif
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S
> index 5d0b7a4..e2b8698 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S
> @@ -14,6 +14,48 @@
>  #include <asm/arch/mp.h>
>  #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
> +
> +/* fixup GIC offset
> +* For LS1043a rev1.0, GIC base address align with 4k.
> +* For LS1043a rev1.1, if DCFG_GIC400_ALIGN[GIC_ADDR_BIT]
> +* is set, GIC base address align with 4K, or else align
> +* with 64k.
> +* output:
> +*	x0: the base address of GICD
> +*	x1: the base address of GICC
> +*/
> +ENTRY(fix_gic_offset)
> +	ldr     x0, =GICD_BASE
> +	ldr     x1, =GICC_BASE
> +	ldr     x3, =DCFG_CCSR_SVR
> +	ldr	w3, [x3]
> +	rev	w3, w3
> +	ands	w3, w3, #0xff
> +	cmp	w3, #REV1_0
> +	b.eq	1f
> +	ldr	x3, =SCFG_GIC400_ALIGN
> +	ldr	w3, [x3]
> +	rev	w3, w3
> +	tbnz	w3, #GIC_ADDR_BIT, 1f
> +	ret
> +1:
> +	ldr     x0, =GICD_BASE_4K
> +	ldr     x1, =GICC_BASE_4K
> +	ret
> +ENDPROC(fix_gic_offset)

The more I read it, the more I think the function name should be called 
get_gic_offset. You are not fixing it, the return value is the correct 
gic offset.

> +
> +ENTRY(smp_kick_all_cpus)
> +	/* Kick secondary cpus up by SGI 0 interrupt */
> +	mov	x29, lr			/* Save LR */
> +	bl	fix_gic_offset
> +	bl	gic_kick_secondary_cpus
> +	mov	lr, x29			/* Restore LR */
> +	ret
> +ENDPROC(smp_kick_all_cpus)

Another way to do this is to implement a weak get_gic_offset function in 
start.S to return GICD_BASE. You can implement another function here to 
return correct offset. If you want to replace smp_kick_all_cpus, you may 
want to keep the #if condition to check CONFIG_GICV2 or CONFIG_GICV3, in 
case we need to debug without GIC.

> +
> +#endif
> +
>  ENTRY(lowlevel_init)
>  	mov	x29, lr			/* Save LR */
>
> @@ -105,15 +147,23 @@ ENTRY(lowlevel_init)
>  	/* Initialize GIC Secure Bank Status */
>  #if defined(CONFIG_GICV2) || defined(CONFIG_GICV3)
>  	branch_if_slave x0, 1f
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
> +	bl	fix_gic_offset
> +#else
>  	ldr	x0, =GICD_BASE
> +#endif

If you use get_gic_offset, you can get rid of this #ifdef.

>  	bl	gic_init_secure
>  1:
>  #ifdef CONFIG_GICV3
>  	ldr	x0, =GICR_BASE
>  	bl	gic_init_secure_percpu
>  #elif defined(CONFIG_GICV2)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
> +	bl	fix_gic_offset
> +#else
>  	ldr	x0, =GICD_BASE
>  	ldr	x1, =GICC_BASE
> +#endif
>  	bl	gic_init_secure_percpu
>  #endif
>  #endif
> @@ -335,7 +385,12 @@ ENTRY(secondary_boot_func)
>  #if defined(CONFIG_GICV3)
>  	gic_wait_for_interrupt_m x0
>  #elif defined(CONFIG_GICV2)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
> +	bl	fix_gic_offset
> +	mov	x0, x1
> +#else
>          ldr     x0, =GICC_BASE
> +#endif
>          gic_wait_for_interrupt_m x0, w1
>  #endif
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h
> index 4201e0f..47e21c5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h
> @@ -172,8 +172,24 @@
>  #define SMMU_BASE		0x09000000
>
>  /* Generic Interrupt Controller Definitions */
> -#define GICD_BASE		0x01401000
> -#define GICC_BASE		0x01402000
> +#define GICD_BASE		0x01410000
> +#define GICC_BASE		0x01420000
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_FEATURE_GIC4K_ALIGN
> +#define GICD_BASE_4K            0x01401000
> +#define GICC_BASE_4K            0x01402000
> +#define GICH_BASE_4K            0x01404000
> +#define GICV_BASE_4K            0x01406000

Are you using space instead of tab here?

> +#define GICD_SIZE_4K		0x1000
> +#define GICC_SIZE_4K		0x2000
> +#define GICH_SIZE_4K		0x2000
> +#define GICV_SIZE_4K		0x2000
> +#endif

This is a bit odd. You have rev 1.0 first, which uses 4K alignment. Yet 
you have kernel device tree using 64K alignment. How did it work before?
Now you have rev 1.1, you make 64K as default, and replace it with 4K if 
a bit is set, or rev 1.0 SoC is detected. You are not changing anything 
actually, but to return the correct offset for the three situations, 
i.e. rev 1.0 SoC, rev 1.1 SoC with the bit cleared, rev 1.1 SoC with bit 
set.

The only "fix" part in this patch is to fixup device tree. I suggest you 
read the device tree to determine which alignment you have there, and 
update accordingly, for both 4K and 64K alignment. I don't think you 
presumption of 64K will stand.

If GIC_ADDR_BIT is always set for SoCs with 4K alignment, you can get 
rid of the Kconfig option.

York


More information about the U-Boot mailing list