[U-Boot] [PATCH] omap3: i2c: correct register

Adam Ford aford173 at gmail.com
Sun Apr 9 02:29:16 UTC 2017


On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 05:34:29PM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
>
> > The register names and offset were not correct as per the TRM for OMAP3530
> > and OMAP3630.  Correct the naing and offsets per the documentation
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173 at gmail.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/i2c.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/i2c.h
> > index b370290..6b3a3da 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/i2c.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/i2c.h
> > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ struct i2c {
> >       unsigned short res2;
> >       unsigned short stat;    /* 0x08 */
> >       unsigned short res3;
> > -     unsigned short iv;      /* 0x0C */
> > +     unsigned short we;      /* 0x0C */
> >       unsigned short res4;
> >       unsigned short syss;    /* 0x10 */
> >       unsigned short res4a;
> > @@ -43,6 +43,18 @@ struct i2c {
> >       unsigned short res14;
> >       unsigned short systest; /* 0x3c */
> >       unsigned short res15;
> > +     unsigned short bufstat; /* 0x40 */
> > +     unsigned short res16;
> > +     unsigned short oa1;     /* 0x44 */
> > +     unsigned short res17;
> > +     unsigned short oa2;     /* 0x48 */
> > +     unsigned short res18;
> > +     unsigned short oa3;     /* 0x4c */
> > +     unsigned short res19;
> > +     unsigned short actoa;   /* 0x50 */
> > +     unsigned short res20;
> > +     unsigned short sblock;  /* 0x54 */
> > +     unsigned short res21;
> >  };
>
> Are we making use of any of these new entries?

Not really.  I am trying to get DM_I2C working on OMAP3 and I was
looking through the history of what was done to make it work on AM33xx
and OMAP4+.  Commit 3465f807d4b90378d86b3 ("omap4: i2c: correct
register offset for sync register") corrected some incorrect
registers, so I thought I'd look through the corresponding file for
omap3.  I noticed that offset 0x0C was not named right per the TRM, so
I read through to the rest.  I can see the argument for not pulling in
the new stuff, but I was trying to be consistent with what was done
for omap4 and omap5.

adam

>
>
> --
> Tom


More information about the U-Boot mailing list