[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/6] am33xx: Provide platform data for mmc

[Tom Rini]

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 12:20:46PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla at ti.com>
> ---
>  board/ti/am335x/board.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/board/ti/am335x/board.c b/board/ti/am335x/board.c
> index 3e842d3187..566183e669 100644
> --- a/board/ti/am335x/board.c
> +++ b/board/ti/am335x/board.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <common.h>
> +#include <dm.h>
>  #include <errno.h>
>  #include <spl.h>
>  #include <serial.h>
> @@ -26,6 +27,7 @@
>  #include <asm/emif.h>
>  #include <asm/gpio.h>
>  #include <asm/omap_sec_common.h>
> +#include <asm/omap_mmc.h>
>  #include <i2c.h>
>  #include <miiphy.h>
>  #include <cpsw.h>
> @@ -892,3 +894,33 @@ void board_fit_image_post_process(void **p_image, size_t *p_size)
>  	secure_boot_verify_image(p_image, p_size);
>  }
>  #endif
> +
> +#if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_CONTROL)
> +static const struct omap_hsmmc_plat am335x_mmc0_platdata = {
> +	.base_addr = (struct hsmmc *)0x48060000,

OK.  So, off the top of my head, from Adam's series about converting
omap3, OMAP_HSMMC1_BASE and company aren't defined correctly?  Or we're
playing games with that 0x100 offset?  I bring this up as since we have
defines for these base addresses already, we should make use of them,
but in this case first we'll have to do... something, yes?

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20170425/918e78b4/attachment.sig>