[U-Boot] [PATCH] vsprintf.c: add wide string (%ls) support
Heinrich Schuchardt
xypron.glpk at gmx.de
Wed Aug 2 21:40:52 UTC 2017
On 08/02/2017 08:15 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk at gmx.de> wrote:
>> On 08/02/2017 11:38 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk at gmx.de> wrote:
>>>> On 07/31/2017 02:42 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>>>> This is convenient for efi_loader which deals a lot with utf16.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> lib/vsprintf.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
>>>>> index 874a2951f7..84e157ecb1 100644
>>>>> --- a/lib/vsprintf.c
>>>>> +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
>>>>> @@ -270,6 +270,35 @@ static char *string(char *buf, char *end, char *s, int field_width,
>>>>> return buf;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +static size_t strnlen16(const u16* s, size_t count)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + const u16 *sc;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + for (sc = s; count-- && *sc; ++sc)
>>>>> + /* nothing */;
>>>>> + return sc - s;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static char *string16(char *buf, char *end, u16 *s, int field_width,
>>>>> + int precision, int flags)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + int len, i;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (s == NULL)
>>>>> + s = L"<NULL>";
>>>>
>>>> The L notation creates a wchar_t string. The width of wchar_t depends on
>>>> gcc compiler flag -fshort-wchar.
>>>>
>>>> vsprintf.c is not compiled with -fshort-wchar. So change this to
>>>>
>>>> const u16 null[] = { '<', 'N', 'U', 'L', 'L', '>', 0};
>>>> s = null;
>>>
>>> oh, I have another patch that adds -fshort-wchar globally.. which I
>>> probably should have split out and sent with this.
>>>
>>> The problem is we cannot mix objects using short-wchar and ones that
>>> don't without a compiler warning. Travis would complain a lot more
>>> but I guess BOOTEFI_HELLO is not normally enabled.
>>>
>>> With addition of efi_bootmgr.c we really want to be able to use
>>> L"string" to be u16.. and I don't think u-boot has any good reason to
>>> use 32b wchar.
>>>
>>> But maybe for this code I should use wchar_t instead of u16.
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> -R
>>
>> ext4 filenames may contain letters with Unicode values > 2**16,
>> e.g. using Takri letters: 𑚀𑚁𑚂
>>
>> So ext4ls probably should be enabled to display these on a Unicode console.
>>
>> Using -fshort-wchar globally is not necessary. Only UEFI requires 16 bit
>> wchar_t. We should rather not enforce the UEFI standard on the rest of
>> the code.
>
> The alternative is disabling a gcc warning about mixing 32b and 16b
> wchar.. and really mixing 32b and 16b wchar seems like a bad idea.
>
> We could use -fshort-wchar only if EFI_LOADER is enabled. Technically
> if we are a UEFI implementation, we do not need to have ext2/ext4 (or
> really anything other than fat/vfat).
You can avoid the problem of variable width wchar by using constants
starting with u (e.g. u"Hello world") which are char16_t (introduced
with C11, #include <uchar.h>) and converting to utf-8 for console output.
This way we do not need -fshort-wchar at all.
Best regards
Heinrich
>
>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> + len = strnlen16(s, precision);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!(flags & LEFT))
>>>>> + while (len < field_width--)
>>>>> + ADDCH(buf, ' ');
>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < len; ++i)
>>>>> + ADDCH(buf, *s++);
>>
>> I would prefer to see a conversion to UTF-8 here.
>>
>> Conversion from 32bit Unicode (Or the capped 16bit Unicode of EFI) is
>> quite easy. This is what I used in another project:
>>
>> uint32_t u = s[i];
>> char c[5];
>> if (u < 0x80) {
>> c[0] = u & 0x7F;
>> c[1] = 0;
>> str.append(c);
>> } else if (u < 0x800) {
>> c[1] = 0x80 | (u & 0x3F);
>> u >>= 6;
>> c[0] = 0xC0 | (u & 0x1F);
>> c[2] = 0;
>> str.append(c);
>> } else if (u < 0x10000) {
>> c[2] = 0x80 | (u & 0x3F);
>> u >>= 6;
>> c[1] = 0x80 | (u & 0x3F);
>> u >>= 6;
>> c[0] = 0xE0 | (u & 0x0F);
>> c[3] = 0;
>> str.append(c);
>> } else if (u < 0x200000) {
>> c[3] = 0x80 | (u & 0x3F);
>> u >>= 6;
>> c[2] = 0x80 | (u & 0x3F);
>> u >>= 6;
>> c[1] = 0x80 | (u & 0x3F);
>> u >>= 6;
>> c[0] = 0xF0 | (u & 0x07);
>> c[4] = 0;
>> str.append(c);
>> } else {
>> throw invalid;
>> }
>
> I did add a utf16_to_utf8() (based on code from grub) as part of the
> efi-variables patch, since there we are dealing with utf16 coming from
> outside of grub. I guess I could use that. I think that mostly
> matters if we end up printing strings that originate outside of
> u-boot, but I guess that will be the case for filenames in a
> device-path.
>
> BR,
> -R
>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Heinrich
>>
>>>>> + while (len < field_width--)
>>>>> + ADDCH(buf, ' ');
>>>>> + return buf;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_CMD_NET
>>>>> static const char hex_asc[] = "0123456789abcdef";
>>>>> #define hex_asc_lo(x) hex_asc[((x) & 0x0f)]
>>>>> @@ -528,8 +557,14 @@ repeat:
>>>>> continue;
>>>>>
>>>>> case 's':
>>>>> - str = string(str, end, va_arg(args, char *),
>>>>> - field_width, precision, flags);
>>>>> + if (qualifier == 'l') {
>>>>
>>>> According to ISO 9899:1999 %ls is used to indicate a wchar_t string,
>>>> which may be u32 * or u16 * depending on GCC flag -fshort-wchar.
>>>>
>>>> Wouldn't it make sense to use some other notation, e.g. %S, to indicate
>>>> that we explicitly mean u16 *?
>>>>
>>>> Please, add a comment into the code indicating why we need u16 * support
>>>> referring to the UEFI spec.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>>
>>>> Heinrich
>>>>
>>>>> + str = string16(str, end, va_arg(args, u16 *),
>>>>> + field_width, precision, flags);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + } else {
>>>>> + str = string(str, end, va_arg(args, char *),
>>>>> + field_width, precision, flags);
>>>>> + }
>>>>> continue;
>>>>>
>>>>> case 'p':
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list