[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8] armv8: Add workaround for USB erratum A-009008

[Ran Wang]

Hi York,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: York Sun
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 11:13 PM
> To: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1 at nxp.com>; Albert Aribaud
> <albert.u.boot at aribaud.net>
> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>; Sriram Dash <sriram.dash at nxp.com>;
> Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat at nxp.com>; Andy Tang <andy.tang at nxp.com>;
> Shengzhou Liu <shengzhou.liu at nxp.com>; Priyanka Jain
> <priyanka.jain at nxp.com>; Prabhakar Kushwaha
> <prabhakar.kushwaha at nxp.com>; open list <u-boot at lists.denx.de>; Xiaobo Xie
> <xiaobo.xie at nxp.com>; Suresh Gupta <suresh.bhagat at nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] armv8: Add workaround for USB erratum A-009008
> 
> On 08/02/2017 02:55 AM, Ran Wang wrote:
> > Hello Sir,
> >      May I know the review result for this patch set? Thank you.
> > BR
> > Ran
> 
> Ran,
> 
> I have seen three versions from Suresh, one version from Yinbo, and one version
> from you. Neither you or Yinbo updated the version number, or included change
> log. You have Suresh's signature on 7 of the 8 patches.

Yes, actually the patch set what I submitted is basing on Suresh's last one but adding some
new defect fix after I re-checked the old patch and chip data sheet and also following your 
for requirement of using out_le16().
> So I am guessing you are resending the patches based on my comment to
> Yingbo's patch set. Without any information, I am treating them as new patches
> and will review them in the order I receive them.

Well, I am not sure the submit rule on case of changing submitter and some function in middle way.
So I decide to submit it as v1. You can treat it as a new one and review in order
(I just don't know the roughly period it will take, so sent out last mail :) ), any question or
suggestion please feel free to let me know. Thanks for your time.
 
BR
Ran