[U-Boot] [PATCH v0 21/20] efi_loader: hack for archs that cannot do unaligned accesses
Heinrich Schuchardt
xypron.glpk at gmx.de
Sat Aug 5 16:12:41 UTC 2017
On 08/05/2017 05:58 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> Some arch's have trouble with unaligned accesses. Technically
> EFI device-path structs should be byte aligned, and the next node
> in the path starts immediately after the previous. Meaning that
> a pointer to an 'struct efi_device_path' is not necessarily word
> aligned. See section 10.3.1 in v2.7 of UEFI spec.
>
> This causes problems not just for u-boot, but also most/all EFI
> payloads loaded by u-boot on these archs. Fortunately the common
> practice for traversing a device path is to rely on the length
> field in the header, rather than the specified length of the
> particular device path type+subtype. So the EFI_DP_PAD() macro
> will add the specified number of bytes to the tail of device path
> structs to pad them to word alignment.
>
> Technically this is non-compliant, BROKEN_UNALIGNED should *only*
> be defined on archs that cannot do unaligned accesses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com>
> ---
> I'm not sure if there are other arch's that need -DBROKEN_UNALIGNED
>
> Mark, this is untested but I think it should solve your crash on the
> Banana Pi. Could you give it a try when you get a chance?
>
> arch/arm/config.mk | 2 +-
> include/efi_api.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/efi_loader/efi_device_path.c | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/config.mk b/arch/arm/config.mk
> index 1a77779db4..067dc93a9d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/config.mk
> +++ b/arch/arm/config.mk
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ LLVMS_RELFLAGS := $(call cc-option,-mllvm,) \
> $(call cc-option,-arm-use-movt=0,)
> PLATFORM_RELFLAGS += $(LLVM_RELFLAGS)
>
> -PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS += -D__ARM__
> +PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS += -D__ARM__ -DBROKEN_UNALIGNED
NAK
We have more then ARM. And other architectures also create exceptions
for unaligned access.
I hate platform specific code. It should not be used outside /arch.
To play it save you should not use _packed at all!
Use memcpy to transfer between aligned and unaligned memory.
Best regards
Heinrich
>
> ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> PLATFORM_ELFFLAGS += -B aarch64 -O elf64-littleaarch64
> diff --git a/include/efi_api.h b/include/efi_api.h
> index ef91e34c7b..ddd1e6100a 100644
> --- a/include/efi_api.h
> +++ b/include/efi_api.h
> @@ -284,6 +284,31 @@ struct efi_loaded_image {
> #define DEVICE_PATH_TYPE_END 0x7f
> # define DEVICE_PATH_SUB_TYPE_END 0xff
>
> +/*
> + * Some arch's have trouble with unaligned accesses. Technically
> + * EFI device-path structs should be byte aligned, and the next node
> + * in the path starts immediately after the previous. Meaning that
> + * a pointer to an 'struct efi_device_path' is not necessarily word
> + * aligned. See section 10.3.1 in v2.7 of UEFI spec.
> + *
> + * This causes problems not just for u-boot, but also most/all EFI
> + * payloads loaded by u-boot on these archs. Fortunately the common
> + * practice for traversing a device path is to rely on the length
> + * field in the header, rather than the specified length of the
> + * particular device path type+subtype. So the EFI_DP_PAD() macro
> + * will add the specified number of bytes to the tail of device path
> + * structs to pad them to word alignment.
> + *
> + * Technically this is non-compliant, BROKEN_UNALIGNED should *only*
> + * be defined on archs that cannot do unaligned accesses.
> + */
> +
> +#ifdef BROKEN_UNALIGNED
> +# define EFI_DP_PAD(n) u8 __pad[n]
> +#else
> +# define EFI_DP_PAD(n)
> +#endif
> +
> struct efi_device_path {
> u8 type;
> u8 sub_type;
> @@ -318,12 +343,14 @@ struct efi_device_path_usb {
> struct efi_device_path dp;
> u8 parent_port_number;
> u8 usb_interface;
> + EFI_DP_PAD(2);
> } __packed;
>
> struct efi_device_path_mac_addr {
> struct efi_device_path dp;
> struct efi_mac_addr mac;
> u8 if_type;
> + EFI_DP_PAD(3);
> } __packed;
>
> struct efi_device_path_usb_class {
> @@ -333,11 +360,13 @@ struct efi_device_path_usb_class {
> u8 device_class;
> u8 device_subclass;
> u8 device_protocol;
> + EFI_DP_PAD(1);
> } __packed;
>
> struct efi_device_path_sd_mmc_path {
> struct efi_device_path dp;
> u8 slot_number;
> + EFI_DP_PAD(3);
> } __packed;
>
> #define DEVICE_PATH_TYPE_MEDIA_DEVICE 0x04
> @@ -353,6 +382,7 @@ struct efi_device_path_hard_drive_path {
> u8 partition_signature[16];
> u8 partmap_type;
> u8 signature_type;
> + EFI_DP_PAD(1);
> } __packed;
>
> struct efi_device_path_cdrom_path {
> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_device_path.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_device_path.c
> index b5acf73f98..515a1f4737 100644
> --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_device_path.c
> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_device_path.c
> @@ -402,6 +402,9 @@ struct efi_device_path *efi_dp_from_file(struct blk_desc *desc, int part,
>
> // TODO efi_device_path_file_path should be variable length:
> fpsize = sizeof(struct efi_device_path) + 2 * (strlen(path) + 1);
> +#ifdef BROKEN_UNALIGNED
> + fpsize = ALIGN(fpsize, 4);
> +#endif
> dpsize += fpsize;
>
> start = buf = calloc(1, dpsize + sizeof(END));
>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list