[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] sandbox: Convert SANDBOX_BITS_PER_LONG to Kconfig
Bin Meng
bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Sun Aug 6 09:13:38 UTC 2017
Hi Simon,
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi Bin,
>
> On 3 August 2017 at 18:17, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Bin,
>>>
>>> On 1 August 2017 at 17:33, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Convert SANDBOX_BITS_PER_LONG to Kconfig and assign it a correct
>>>> number depending on which host we are going to build and run.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> arch/sandbox/Kconfig | 5 +++++
>>>> board/sandbox/README.sandbox | 7 +++----
>>>> scripts/config_whitelist.txt | 1 -
>>>> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>>
>>> Is it OK to build 64-bit sandbox on a 32-bit machine? Does that actually work?
>>>
>>> If then I think we need a 3-way setting like:
>>>
>>> - 32-bit
>>> - 64-bit
>>> - native (i.e. whatever the host is)
>>
>> That means cross-compiling sandbox. So far this is not working. I will
>> take a look.
>
> Or perhaps we just require it to use the bit size of the host? Does
> compiling 64-bit U-Boot on a 32-bit machine actually work?
>
I have not looked into that further but I suspect there is more work
than the bit size of the host, for example, linking 64-bit vs. 32-bit
libraries?
Regards,
Bin
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list