[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/16] dtoc: Add support for 64-bit addresses

Dr. Philipp Tomsich philipp.tomsich at theobroma-systems.com
Wed Aug 30 10:12:33 UTC 2017

> On 30 Aug 2017, at 11:37, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
> On 30 August 2017 at 04:31, Dr. Philipp Tomsich
> <philipp.tomsich at theobroma-systems.com> wrote:
>> Simon,
>> I should be able to give this a test drive on the RK3368 by the end of the week.
>> For the RK3399 our board uses full OF_CONTROL, so I won’t really exercise
>> this there.
>> Given that the RK3399 can always fall back to OF_CONTROL for SPL (as is the
>> default on Puma) and this only blocks the RK3368 TPL (which is not enabled
>> for any other boards than Lion): should we try to get this merged for this release
>> cycle or let it slip into the new merge window?
> My preference would be to put it in a next branch, but if nothing else
> uses it then I suppose it is possible (up to you and Tom)? What is
> broken that this fixes?

RK3399: SPL for all platforms using OF_PLATDATA
RK3368: TPL (uses OF_PLATDATA)

Given that TPL for the RK3368 is not used much (and we have a private branch
for people that need it), I don’t mind going with the ‘next’ branch.

I know that Kever has a few board configurations (EVB-RK3399, Firefly-RK3399)
that are affected, but I’d rather see these moved to OF_CONTROL instead of


More information about the U-Boot mailing list