[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 03/40] dm: blk: Add a generic function for block device commands
Bin Meng
bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Thu Aug 31 12:53:45 UTC 2017
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi Bin,
>
> On 1 August 2017 at 12:56, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 1:34 AM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>>> Most block devices provide a command (e.g. 'sata', 'scsi', 'ide') and
>>> these commands generally do the same thing. This makes it harder to
>>> maintain this code and keep it consistent.
>>>
>>> We now have a block device interface which is either implemented by driver
>>> model (when CONFIG_BLK is enabled) or with a legacy interface. Therefore
>>> it is possible to handle most of what these commands do with generic code.
>>>
>>> Add a new generic function to process block-device commands using the
>>> interface type and the current device number for that type.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v2: None
>>>
>>> cmd/Makefile | 1 +
>>> cmd/blk_common.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/blk.h | 12 +++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 cmd/blk_common.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/cmd/Makefile b/cmd/Makefile
>>> index bd231f24d8..e2b3a9cc71 100644
>>> --- a/cmd/Makefile
>>> +++ b/cmd/Makefile
>>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ obj-y += version.o
>>> # command
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_AES) += aes.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_ARMFLASH) += armflash.o
>>> +obj-y += blk_common.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_SOURCE) += source.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_SOURCE) += source.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_CMD_BDI) += bdinfo.o
>>> diff --git a/cmd/blk_common.c b/cmd/blk_common.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000000..86c75e78d8
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/cmd/blk_common.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * Handling of common block commands
>>> + *
>>> + * Copyright (c) 2017 Google, Inc
>>> + *
>>> + * (C) Copyright 2000-2011
>>> + * Wolfgang Denk, DENX Software Engineering, wd at denx.de.
>>> + *
>>> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#include <common.h>
>>> +#include <blk.h>
>>> +
>>> +#ifdef HAVE_BLOCK_DEVICE
>>> +int blk_common_cmd(int argc, char * const argv[], enum if_type if_type,
>>> + int *cur_devnump)
>>> +{
>>> + const char *if_name = blk_get_if_type_name(if_type);
>>> +
>>> + switch (argc) {
>>> + case 0:
>>> + case 1:
>>> + return CMD_RET_USAGE;
>>> + case 2:
>>> + if (strncmp(argv[1], "inf", 3) == 0) {
>>> + blk_list_devices(if_type);
>>> + return 0;
>>> + } else if (strncmp(argv[1], "dev", 3) == 0) {
>>> + if (blk_print_device_num(if_type, *cur_devnump)) {
>>> + printf("\nno %s devices available\n", if_name);
>>> + return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
>>> + }
>>> + return 0;
>>> + } else if (strncmp(argv[1], "part", 4) == 0) {
>>> + if (blk_list_part(if_type))
>>> + printf("\nno %s devices available\n", if_name);
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> + return CMD_RET_USAGE;
>>> + case 3:
>>> + if (strncmp(argv[1], "dev", 3) == 0) {
>>> + int dev = (int)simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 10);
>>> +
>>> + if (!blk_show_device(if_type, dev)) {
>>> + *cur_devnump = dev;
>>> + printf("... is now current device\n");
>>> + } else {
>>> + return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
>>> + }
>>> + return 0;
>>> + } else if (strncmp(argv[1], "part", 4) == 0) {
>>> + int dev = (int)simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 10);
>>> +
>>> + if (blk_print_part_devnum(if_type, dev)) {
>>> + printf("\n%s device %d not available\n",
>>> + if_name, dev);
>>> + return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
>>> + }
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> + return CMD_RET_USAGE;
>>> +
>>> + default: /* at least 4 args */
>>> + if (strcmp(argv[1], "read") == 0) {
>>> + ulong addr = simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 16);
>>> + lbaint_t blk = simple_strtoul(argv[3], NULL, 16);
>>> + ulong cnt = simple_strtoul(argv[4], NULL, 16);
>>> + ulong n;
>>> +
>>> + printf("\n%s read: device %d block # %lld, count %ld ... ",
>>> + if_name, *cur_devnump, (unsigned long long)blk,
>>> + cnt);
>>
>> Please use LBAFU for parameter blk, to handle both 32-bit and 64-bit LBA.
>
> It looks like you have kindly done a patch for that?
>
Yes, http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/804298/, but not applied yet.
Regards,
Bin
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list