[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/5] sunxi: a64: Enable FIT Signature

Maxime Ripard maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com
Fri Dec 15 13:41:57 UTC 2017


On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 02:03:12PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:33:02AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >> From: Jagan Teki <jagannadh.teki at gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Enable FIT_SIGNATURE for sunxi a64.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>
> >> ---
> >> Changes for v3:
> >> - Move imply outside block
> >> Changes for v2:
> >> - Use imply instead of select
> >>
> >>  arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig | 1 +
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
> >> index 1fededd..05e2d47 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig
> >> @@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ config MACH_SUN50I
> >>       select SUNXI_DRAM_DW_32BIT
> >>       select FIT
> >>       select SPL_LOAD_FIT
> >> +     imply FIT_SIGNATURE
> >
> > I'm really not sure we should force it by default. How much code size
> > is it adding?
> 
> Why we need to consider u-boot size? (because it may cross the loader2 size?)
> Here is the delta of u-boot elf

The same reason than anything else on our arm64 builds lately: we have
a u-boot binary too big for the size compared to our environment offset.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20171215/04d78c7b/attachment.sig>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list