[U-Boot] [PATCH] musb: sunxi: Use base address from device tree

Marek Vasut marex at denx.de
Tue Dec 19 16:08:40 UTC 2017


On 12/19/2017 05:04 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>> On 12/12/2017 08:24 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>> Now that the musb sunxi glue driver is completely device model / device
>>> tree driven, we should use the base address from the device tree,
>>> instead of hard-coding it in the source code.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 3a61b080acee ("musb: sunxi: switch to the device model")
>>> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens at csie.org>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/usb/musb-new/sunxi.c | 4 ++--
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb-new/sunxi.c b/drivers/usb/musb-new/sunxi.c
>>> index 7ee44ea91900..ae6a54118cd1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/musb-new/sunxi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb-new/sunxi.c
>>> @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int musb_usb_probe(struct udevice *dev)
>>>
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_USB_MUSB_HOST
>>>       host->host = musb_init_controller(&musb_plat, NULL,
>>> -                                       (void *)SUNXI_USB0_BASE);
>>> +                                      dev_read_addr_ptr(dev));
>>
>> What happens if dev_read_addr_ptr() returns some non-standard value?
> 
> You mean like an error value? That would likely be a signal that
> the device tree is broken, like a missing property or invalid value,
> or a corrupt device tree. In all cases I think blowing up should be
> an expected result for a device tree driven driver?

What about handling the errors instead ? :)

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut


More information about the U-Boot mailing list