[U-Boot] why two "config FIT_VERBOSE" lines in top-level Kconfig?

[Robert P. J. Day]

  weird ...

  config FIT_VERBOSE
        bool "Display verbose messages on FIT boot"
        depends on FIT

  ... jump to a bit lower down ...

  config FIT_VERBOSE
        bool "Show verbose messages when FIT images fails"
        depends on FIT
        help
          Generally a system will have valid FIT images so debug messages
          are a waste of code space. If you are debugging your images then
          you can enable this option to get more verbose information about
          failures.

this is really a lead-in to a larger question -- any objection to
refactoring some of the Kconfig files that have numerous identical
dependency lines which could be replaced by a simpler "if" test?

  that top-level Kconfig file is a candidate, given the number of
"depends on FIT" lines that could be removed and surrounded by:

  if FIT
  ...
  endif

and some Kconfig files have entries in a weird order such that, if you
select a feature, dependent features suddenly pop up somewhere else in
the display, a bit disconcerting.

  anyway, i'll post a refactored top-level Kconfig, so people can see
what i'm talking about.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================