[U-Boot] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainer for TI security related files
Jagan Teki
jagannadh.teki at gmail.com
Sun Jan 15 19:50:35 CET 2017
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Andrew F. Davis <afd at ti.com> wrote:
> Changes involving High-Security boards should be CC'd for additional
> assessment of the security implications.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd at ti.com>
> ---
> Recently some fastboot additions have been made that may effect security
> on our HS boards by letting some boot methods work around our chain-of-
> trust. It would be nice to get a CC for changes that directly effect
> these HS boards so I have a chance to check for this kind of thing.
>
> MAINTAINERS | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 793ff49f68..1ea7ae013a 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -434,6 +434,17 @@ S: Maintained
> F: drivers/spmi/
> F: include/spmi/
>
> +TI SYSTEM SECURITY
> +M: Andrew F. Davis <afd at ti.com>
> +S: Supported
> +F: arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap5/sec_entry_cpu1.S
> +F: arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap5/sec-fxns.c
> +F: arch/arm/mach-omap2/sec-common.c
> +F: arch/arm/mach-omap2/config_secure.mk
> +F: configs/am43xx_hs_evm_defconfig
> +F: configs/am57xx_hs_evm_defconfig
> +F: configs/dra7xx_hs_evm_defconfig
I thought of commenting this but some how missed, configs/*_defconfig
files shouldn't be part of MAINTAINERS it has a separate file in
respective boards.
thanks!
--
Jagan Teki
Free Software Engineer | www.openedev.com
U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer
Hyderabad, India.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list