[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] armv8: aarch64: Fix the warning about x1-x3 nonzero issue
Alison Wang
alison.wang at nxp.com
Tue Jan 17 02:48:08 CET 2017
> On 16/01/2017 07:16, Alison Wang wrote:
> > For 64-bit kernel, there is a warning about x1-x3 nonzero in
> violation
> > of boot protocol. To fix this issue, input argument 4 is added for
> > armv8_switch_to_el2 and armv8_switch_to_el1. The input argument 4
> will
> > be set to the right value, such as zero.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alison Wang <alison.wang at nxp.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Add another input argument 4 for armv8_switch_to_el2 and
> armv8_switch_to_el1.
> > - Give up the previous way to adjust the parameters to transfer and
> make sure x3 is zero.
> >
> > arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S | 28 ++++++++++++++----
> ----------
> > arch/arm/cpu/armv8/sec_firmware_asm.S | 5 +++--
> > arch/arm/cpu/armv8/start.S | 8 ++++----
> > arch/arm/cpu/armv8/transition.S | 22 +++++++++++-------
> ----
> > arch/arm/include/asm/system.h | 8 +++++---
> > arch/arm/lib/bootm.c | 10 +++++-----
> > arch/arm/mach-rmobile/lowlevel_init_gen3.S | 8 ++++----
> > cmd/bootefi.c | 2 +-
> > 8 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S
> > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S
> > index 72f2c11..63215f0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/lowlevel.S
> > @@ -378,29 +378,29 @@ cpu_is_le:
> > b.eq 1f
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ARMV8_SWITCH_TO_EL1
> > - adr x3, secondary_switch_to_el1
> > - ldr x4, =ES_TO_AARCH64
> > + adr x4, secondary_switch_to_el1
> > + ldr x5, =ES_TO_AARCH64
> > #else
> > - ldr x3, [x11]
> > - ldr x4, =ES_TO_AARCH32
> > + ldr x4, [x11]
> > + ldr x5, =ES_TO_AARCH32
> > #endif
> > bl secondary_switch_to_el2
> >
> > 1:
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ARMV8_SWITCH_TO_EL1
> > - adr x3, secondary_switch_to_el1
> > + adr x4, secondary_switch_to_el1
> > #else
> > - ldr x3, [x11]
> > + ldr x4, [x11]
> > #endif
> > - ldr x4, =ES_TO_AARCH64
> > + ldr x5, =ES_TO_AARCH64
> > bl secondary_switch_to_el2
> >
> > ENDPROC(secondary_boot_func)
> >
> > ENTRY(secondary_switch_to_el2)
> > - switch_el x5, 1f, 0f, 0f
> > + switch_el x6, 1f, 0f, 0f
> > 0: ret
> > -1: armv8_switch_to_el2_m x3, x4, x5
> > +1: armv8_switch_to_el2_m x4, x5, x6
> > ENDPROC(secondary_switch_to_el2)
> >
> > ENTRY(secondary_switch_to_el1)
> > @@ -414,22 +414,22 @@ ENTRY(secondary_switch_to_el1)
> > /* physical address of this cpus spin table element */
> > add x11, x1, x0
> >
> > - ldr x3, [x11]
> > + ldr x4, [x11]
> >
> > ldr x5, [x11, #24]
> > ldr x6, =IH_ARCH_DEFAULT
> > cmp x6, x5
> > b.eq 2f
> >
> > - ldr x4, =ES_TO_AARCH32
> > + ldr x5, =ES_TO_AARCH32
> > bl switch_to_el1
> >
> > -2: ldr x4, =ES_TO_AARCH64
> > +2: ldr x5, =ES_TO_AARCH64
> >
> > switch_to_el1:
> > - switch_el x5, 0f, 1f, 0f
> > + switch_el x6, 0f, 1f, 0f
> > 0: ret
> > -1: armv8_switch_to_el1_m x3, x4, x5
> > +1: armv8_switch_to_el1_m x4, x5, x6
> > ENDPROC(secondary_switch_to_el1)
> >
> > /* Ensure that the literals used by the secondary boot code are
> diff
> > --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/sec_firmware_asm.S
> > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/sec_firmware_asm.S
> > index 903195d..747b53f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/sec_firmware_asm.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/sec_firmware_asm.S
> > @@ -57,7 +57,8 @@ ENDPROC(_sec_firmware_support_psci_version)
> > * x0: argument, zero
> > * x1: machine nr
> > * x2: fdt address
> > - * x3: kernel entry point
> > + * x3: input argument
> > + * x4: kernel entry point
> > * @param outputs for secure firmware:
> > * x0: function id
> > * x1: kernel entry point
> > @@ -65,7 +66,7 @@ ENDPROC(_sec_firmware_support_psci_version)
> > * x3: fdt address
> > */
> > ENTRY(armv8_el2_to_aarch32)
> > - mov x0, x3
> > + mov x0, x4
>
> You no longer need x0 as scratch register. Just write ...
>
> > mov x3, x2
> > mov x2, x1
> > mov x1, x0
>
> ... x4 directly into x1 here.
>
>
> Otherwise looks good to me. So with the change above you can add my
>
> Reviewed-by: Alexander Graf <agraf at suse.de>
>
> tag in the next version.
>
[Alison Wang] Alex, thanks for your detail comment. I will change it in v3.
Best Regards,
Alison Wang
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list