[U-Boot] [PATCH] pci: don't skip vendor ID 0

Gregory Fong Gregory.Fong at virgingalactic.com
Wed Jan 25 06:25:27 CET 2017

Unlike 0xffff, 0 is not an invalid vendor ID.

Signed-off-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.fong at virgingalactic.com>
Based on question initially asked here:

I've been looking through the book I have on PCI and through various online
resources, and haven't been able to find evidence that a vendor ID of 0 is
invalid, even if it's unusual.  There are still issues in how this will be
handled in e.g. drivers/pci/pci_common.c because pci_hose_find_devices() still
assumes that a vendor and device ID of 0 mean that the last pci_device_id is
reached, but this change at least allows the device's PCI BARs to get
programmed if the vendor ID is 0.

 drivers/pci/pci.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index 6b36c18..3ee7180 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ int pci_hose_scan_bus(struct pci_controller *hose, int bus)
 		pci_hose_read_config_word(hose, dev, PCI_VENDOR_ID, &vendor);
-		if (vendor == 0xffff || vendor == 0x0000)
+		if (vendor == 0xffff)
 		if (!PCI_FUNC(dev))

More information about the U-Boot mailing list