[U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx6ull: fix USB bmode for i.MX 6UL and 6ULL

[Esponde, Joel]

Hi Stefan,

Why did you take the value 0x20 in the table entry instead of the value 0x00 as it is, for example, in the NXP U-Boot?

Is it because this boot mode does not exist in the iMX6UL SOC?

Joël Esponde
Honeywell | Safety and Productivity Solutions

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Fabio Estevam [mailto:festevam at gmail.com]
> Envoyé : samedi 10 juin 2017 00:10
> À : Stefan Agner <stefan at agner.ch>; Esponde, Joel
> <Joel.Esponde at Honeywell.com>
> Cc : Stefano Babic <sbabic at denx.de>; Fabio Estevam
> <fabio.estevam at nxp.com>; Stefan Agner <stefan.agner at toradex.com>; U-
> Boot-Denx <u-boot at lists.denx.de>
> Objet : Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx6ull: fix USB bmode for i.MX 6UL and
> 6ULL
> 
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Stefan Agner <stefan at agner.ch> wrote:
> > From: Stefan Agner <stefan.agner at toradex.com>
> >
> > i.MX 6UL and 6ULL have different boot device capabilities and use
> > therefor use a different boot device selection table than other i.MX 6
> > devices. Particularly, the value which has been used so far (b0001) is
> > assigned to QSPI boot for these two devices.
> >
> > There is no common reserved value for all i.MX 6devices. Use
> > b0010 for i.MX 6UL and 6ULL via compile time ifdef.
> >
> > Reported-by: Joël Esponde <joel.esponde at honeywell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan.agner at toradex.com>
> 
> Thanks for the patch.
> 
> Joël, could you please test it and reply with your Tested-by?
> 
> Thanks