[U-Boot] [PATCH 10/16] usb: xhci: Program 'route string' in the input slot context

Bin Meng bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Thu Jun 29 05:42:15 UTC 2017


Hi Stefan,

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de> wrote:
> Hi Bin,
>
>
> On 29.06.2017 01:00, Bin Meng wrote:
>>
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Bin,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 27.06.2017 10:27, Bin Meng wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Bin,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 27.06.2017 02:01, Bin Meng wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 2:07 AM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 06/24/2017 03:57 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Marek,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 2:02 AM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 06/23/2017 11:54 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> xHCI spec says: the values of the 'route string' field shall be
>>>>>>>>>>> initialized by the first 'Address Device' command issued to a
>>>>>>>>>>> device slot, and shall not be modified by any other command.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So far U-Boot does not program this field, and it does not
>>>>>>>>>>> prevent
>>>>>>>>>>> SS device directly attached to root port, or HS device behind an
>>>>>>>>>>> HS
>>>>>>>>>>> hub, from working, due to the fact that 'route string' is used by
>>>>>>>>>>> the xHC to target SS packets. But in order to enumerate devices
>>>>>>>>>>> behind an SS hub, this field must be programmed.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> With this commit and along with previous commits, now SS & HS
>>>>>>>>>>> devices
>>>>>>>>>>> attached to a USB 3.0 hub can be enumerated by U-Boot.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> As usual, this new feature is only available when DM is on.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Great, but I really dislike the ifdef pollution, so this needs to
>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>> sorted out.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The ifdef was needed due to it calls DM APIs or access DM udevice.
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> have no intention to add a new feature to the non-DM driver.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But then this creates a massive disparity, it's like we're growing
>>>>>>>> two
>>>>>>>> USB stacks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yep, unfortunately. But if we continue adding new features/fixes to
>>>>>>> the old non-DM stuff, I am not sure how this can encourage people to
>>>>>>> switch to DM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Correct. We definitely don't want to add new features to non-DM
>>>>>> drivers / IF, if this is non-trivial.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe I can check all boards that use xHCI to see if
>>>>>>> they are switched to DM?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> xHCI is still quite new in U-Boot, so I would expect that all
>>>>>> platforms using it, are using DM or at least not far away from using
>>>>>> it. Yes, please check all xHCI "users", if they use DM. Then we
>>>>>> know if and which users need some "persuasion" to switch over to
>>>>>> DM soon. ;)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I checked all boards that have CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD defined but without
>>>>> CONFIG_DM_USB. Here is the list.
>>>>>
>>>>> configs/uniphier_v8_defconfig:36:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>>
>>>>> configs/xilinx_zynqmp_zc1751_xm015_dc1_defconfig:62:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/am57xx_evm_nodt_defconfig:53:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/evb-rk3328_defconfig:34:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/ls1021atwr_nor_lpuart_defconfig:43:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/uniphier_pxs2_ld6b_defconfig:44:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/ls1012ardb_qspi_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig:43:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> configs/ls1021atwr_sdcard_ifc_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig:57:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/k2e_hs_evm_defconfig:34:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/ls1021aqds_sdcard_qspi_defconfig:61:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/am43xx_evm_ethboot_defconfig:48:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/xilinx_zynqmp_ep_defconfig:70:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/ls1021aqds_nand_defconfig:57:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/ls1021atwr_qspi_defconfig:50:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/k2g_evm_defconfig:45:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/am57xx_evm_defconfig:63:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/am43xx_hs_evm_defconfig:49:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/am43xx_evm_defconfig:39:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/ls1021atwr_nor_defconfig:42:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/firefly-rk3399_defconfig:59:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/puma-rk3399_defconfig:78:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/cl-som-am57x_defconfig:55:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/ls1021aqds_nor_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig:43:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/uniphier_pro4_defconfig:43:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>>
>>>>> configs/xilinx_zynqmp_zc1751_xm016_dc2_defconfig:61:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/xilinx_zynqmp_zcu102_defconfig:63:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/ls1021atwr_nor_SECURE_BOOT_defconfig:42:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/cm_t43_defconfig:67:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/k2g_hs_evm_defconfig:36:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/am43xx_evm_qspiboot_defconfig:45:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/ls1021aqds_qspi_defconfig:50:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/am57xx_hs_evm_defconfig:67:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/xilinx_zynqmp_zcu102_revB_defconfig:63:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/ls1021aqds_sdcard_ifc_defconfig:55:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/uniphier_ld20_defconfig:39:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/am43xx_evm_usbhost_boot_defconfig:61:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/ls1021atwr_sdcard_qspi_defconfig:61:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/evb-rk3399_defconfig:60:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/k2hk_evm_defconfig:43:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/k2hk_hs_evm_defconfig:34:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/k2e_evm_defconfig:43:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/ls1021atwr_sdcard_ifc_defconfig:54:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>> configs/k2l_evm_defconfig:43:CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
>>>>>
>>>>> So it looks we have lots of conversion work to be done by many board
>>>>> maintainers. I am not sure how to proceed on this.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Marek reminded me, that he thinks that most of these platforms
>>>> above will most likely select DM_USB implicitly via Kconfig.
>>>>
>>>> I did a quick check and it seems that at least these platforms
>>>> have DM_USB enabled:
>>>>
>>>> ARCH_ZYNQ
>>>> ARCH_ZYNQMP
>>>> ARCH_UNIPHIER
>>>> ARCH_ROCKCHIP
>>>>
>>>> and other from above very likely as well.
>>>>
>>>> Before you invest more time and effort into implementing the xHCI
>>>> additions in a "non-DM cleaner way", I suggest to find out which
>>>> targets really use xHCI without USB_DM. An easy check would be to
>>>> add some #error to the non-DM part and run this commit through
>>>> buildman / travis.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>>
>>> Ah, that's really a good idea. Thanks for the hints! I will launch a
>>> buildman testing soon.
>>>
>>
>> Looks we have a smaller list indeed. Here is the buildman results:
>>
>> ls1012ardb_qspi_SECURE_BOOT
>> ls1021atwr_nor_SECURE_BOOT
>> am43xx_hs_evm
>> am57xx_hs_evm
>> ls1021aqds_nand
>> ls1021atwr_nor
>> ls1021atwr_qspi
>> cm_t43
>> ls1021atwr_nor_lpuart
>> ls1021aqds_sdcard_qspi
>> k2hk_hs_evm
>> am43xx_evm
>> ls1021aqds_qspi
>> am57xx_evm_nodt
>> k2g_hs_evm
>> ls1021atwr_sdcard_qspi
>> am43xx_evm_ethboot
>> ls1021aqds_sdcard_ifc
>> k2l_evm
>> am43xx_evm_usbhost_boot
>> am43xx_evm_qspiboot
>> k2g_evm
>> am57xx_evm
>> ls1021atwr_sdcard_ifc
>> cl-som-am57x
>> k2hk_evm
>> k2e_evm
>> ls1021atwr_sdcard_ifc_SECURE_BOOT
>> ls1021aqds_nor_SECURE_BOOT
>> k2e_hs_evm
>
>
> Thanks. So this leaves only some platforms using xHCI without DM_USB
> enabled indeed. I suspect that most of them don't have DM_USB enabled
> just because of oversight. Let me write a short mail to the
> maintainers, to see if they can enable DM_USB to make the way free
> for a complete DM based xHCI support.

Thank you for your help. I see at least ls1021a_xxx boards are because
of oversight as some other ls1021a boards have DM_USB.

Regards,
Bin


More information about the U-Boot mailing list