[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 00/10] stm32f7: add clock and pin control drivers
Vikas MANOCHA
vikas.manocha at st.com
Thu Mar 9 17:04:22 UTC 2017
Hi Tom,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Rini [mailto:trini at konsulko.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 8:18 AM
> To: Vikas MANOCHA <vikas.manocha at st.com>
> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 00/10] stm32f7: add clock and pin control drivers
>
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 03:36:29PM +0000, Vikas MANOCHA wrote:
> > Thanks Tom,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tom Rini [mailto:trini at konsulko.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 7:39 AM
> > > To: Vikas MANOCHA <vikas.manocha at st.com>
> > > Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] stm32f7: add clock and pin control
> > > drivers
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 05:33:58PM +0000, Vikas MANOCHA wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Tom,
> > > >
> > > > If it is ok, please apply this patchset.
> > >
> > > I'll pick it up early in the next release, thanks!
> >
> > Ok, great which means wk'11 (week of March 13th), is it right.
> >
> > I was waiting for this patchset (let us say p1) apply on master before
> > sending another series (let us say p2 : ready at my end for quite some
> > time) applicable on top of p1.
> > In general, is it ok to send the new patchset (e.g. p2) mentioning
> > its dependency (e.g. on p1) or one must have to wait for dependency
> > patches (p1) to be on master.
>
> Yes, sending one series that depends on another series is fine, it's just on you to manage those dependencies :) Thanks!
Yes sure :-), thanks for this info, appreciate it.
Rgds,
Vikas
>
> --
> Tom
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list