[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/6] sunxi: Rename bus-width related macros in H3 DRAM code

[André Przywara]

On 13/03/17 17:50, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> The DesignWare DRAM controller used by H3 and newer SoCs use a bit to
> identify whether the DRAM is half-width.
> 
> As H3 itself come with 32-bit DRAM, the two modes of the bit used to be
> named "MCTL_CR_32BIT" and "MCTL_CR_16BIT", but for SoCs with 16-bit DRAM
> they're really 8-bit and 16-bit.
> 
> Rename the bit's macro, and also rename the variable name in
> dram_sun8i_h3.c.
> 
> This commit do not add 16-bit DRAM controller support, but the support
> will be introduced in next commit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy at aosc.xyz>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/dram_sunxi_dw.h |  6 +++---
>  arch/arm/mach-sunxi/dram_sunxi_dw.c             | 11 ++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/dram_sunxi_dw.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/dram_sunxi_dw.h
> index 25d07d9863..48bd6f7c0f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/dram_sunxi_dw.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/dram_sunxi_dw.h
> @@ -52,9 +52,9 @@ struct sunxi_mctl_com_reg {
>  #define MCTL_CR_SEQUENTIAL	(0x1 << 15)
>  #define MCTL_CR_INTERLEAVED	(0x0 << 15)
>  
> -#define MCTL_CR_32BIT		(0x1 << 12)
> -#define MCTL_CR_16BIT		(0x0 << 12)
> -#define MCTL_CR_BUS_WIDTH(x)	((x) == 32 ? MCTL_CR_32BIT : MCTL_CR_16BIT)
> +#define MCTL_CR_FULL_WIDTH	(0x1 << 12)
> +#define MCTL_CR_HALF_WIDTH	(0x0 << 12)
> +#define MCTL_CR_BUS_FULL_WIDTH(x)	((x) << 12)
>  
>  #define MCTL_CR_PAGE_SIZE(x)	((fls(x) - 4) << 8)
>  #define MCTL_CR_ROW_BITS(x)	(((x) - 1) << 4)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/dram_sunxi_dw.c b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/dram_sunxi_dw.c
> index 9f7cc7fd4c..0c73a43075 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/dram_sunxi_dw.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/dram_sunxi_dw.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>  #define LINES_PER_BYTE_LANE	(BITS_PER_BYTE + 3)
>  struct dram_para {
>  	u16 page_size;
> -	u8 bus_width;
> +	u8 bus_full_width;

So this could be a "bool" then?
And wouldn't it be better to _add_ this variable and keep bus width, so
it could be re-purposed as the actual bus width in the next patch?

The rest of the patch is fine.

Cheers,
Andre.

>  	u8 dual_rank;
>  	u8 row_bits;
>  	const u8 dx_read_delays[NR_OF_BYTE_LANES][LINES_PER_BYTE_LANE];
> @@ -358,7 +358,8 @@ static void mctl_set_cr(struct dram_para *para)
>  			(struct sunxi_mctl_com_reg *)SUNXI_DRAM_COM_BASE;
>  
>  	writel(MCTL_CR_BL8 | MCTL_CR_2T | MCTL_CR_DDR3 | MCTL_CR_INTERLEAVED |
> -	       MCTL_CR_EIGHT_BANKS | MCTL_CR_BUS_WIDTH(para->bus_width) |
> +	       MCTL_CR_EIGHT_BANKS |
> +	       MCTL_CR_BUS_FULL_WIDTH(para->bus_full_width) |
>  	       (para->dual_rank ? MCTL_CR_DUAL_RANK : MCTL_CR_SINGLE_RANK) |
>  	       MCTL_CR_PAGE_SIZE(para->page_size) |
>  	       MCTL_CR_ROW_BITS(para->row_bits), &mctl_com->cr);
> @@ -471,7 +472,7 @@ static int mctl_channel_init(uint16_t socid, struct dram_para *para)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* set half DQ */
> -	if (para->bus_width != 32) {
> +	if (!para->bus_full_width) {
>  		writel(0x0, &mctl_ctl->dx[2].gcr);
>  		writel(0x0, &mctl_ctl->dx[3].gcr);
>  	}
> @@ -509,7 +510,7 @@ static int mctl_channel_init(uint16_t socid, struct dram_para *para)
>  		    ((readl(&mctl_ctl->dx[3].gsr[0]) >> 24) & 0x1)) {
>  			writel(0x0, &mctl_ctl->dx[2].gcr);
>  			writel(0x0, &mctl_ctl->dx[3].gcr);
> -			para->bus_width = 16;
> +			para->bus_full_width = 0;
>  		}
>  
>  		mctl_set_cr(para);
> @@ -613,7 +614,7 @@ unsigned long sunxi_dram_init(void)
>  
>  	struct dram_para para = {
>  		.dual_rank = 0,
> -		.bus_width = 32,
> +		.bus_full_width = 1,
>  		.row_bits = 15,
>  		.page_size = 4096,
>  
>