[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 15/20] arm: socfpga: Add SPL support for Arria 10

[Marek Vasut]

On 03/22/2017 10:21 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>> On 03/22/2017 09:28 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>>>> On 03/09/2017 01:26 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>>>>> Add SPL support for Arria 10 and add reset_uart() to use in SPL.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.chee at intel.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <ley.foon.tan at intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  .../include/mach/reset_manager_arria10.h           |  1 +
>>>>>  arch/arm/mach-socfpga/reset_manager_arria10.c      | 18 +++++++
>>>>>  arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl.c                        | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>  3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/reset_manager_arria10.h b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/reset_manager_arria10.h
>>>>> index e3171d1..d0711cf 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/reset_manager_arria10.h
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/reset_manager_arria10.h
>>>>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ void emac_manage_reset(ulong emacbase, uint state);
>>>>>  int reset_deassert_bridges_handoff(void);
>>>>>  void reset_assert_fpga_connected_peripherals(void);
>>>>>  void reset_deassert_osc1wd0(void);
>>>>> +void reset_uart(int assert);
>>>>>
>>>>>  struct socfpga_reset_manager {
>>>>>       u32     stat;
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/reset_manager_arria10.c b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/reset_manager_arria10.c
>>>>> index 547a8bb..bbf54f0 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/reset_manager_arria10.c
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/reset_manager_arria10.c
>>>>> @@ -28,6 +28,24 @@ static const struct socfpga_system_manager *sysmgr_regs =
>>>>>       ALT_RSTMGR_PER0MODRST_QSPIECC_SET_MSK | \
>>>>>       ALT_RSTMGR_PER0MODRST_SDMMCECC_SET_MSK)
>>>>
>>>> Should be part of reset manager patch ...
>>> Do you mean by the reset_uart() below? In the last review, you comment
>>> that uart_com_port() is in later patch (misc path) of reset manager
>>> patch. So, I moved this function to this here. Let me know if you
>>> prefer a new patch this reset_uart().
>>
>> It just doesn't seem right to have reset-manager code bits in SPL patch,
>> that's all . Do you mean you have the uart_com_port() function
>> in misc.c and this reset manager bit depends on it ? Then swap patches
>> 3 and 4 and you can wrap this function into the reset manager part, no?
> 
> uart_com_port() is in patch 10 (misc arria10). I can't swap reset
> arria 10 and misc arria 10 because misc arria 10 got dependency on
> reset arria 10 patch too..:(
> What I mean is add a new patch just before this SPL patch to add reset_uart().
> 

Well uh, I have to admit I'm a bit lost in the series and the
discussion. Is there any chance you can make the series bisectable ?
That's what I'd like to see.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut