[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] rockchip: rk3188: Add Radxa Rock board
Heiko Stuebner
heiko at sntech.de
Sun Mar 26 22:38:33 UTC 2017
Am Sonntag, 26. März 2017, 15:28:44 CEST schrieb Simon Glass:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> On 26 March 2017 at 15:00, Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 26. März 2017, 22:52:16 CEST schrieb Heiko Stuebner:
> >> Am Sonntag, 26. März 2017, 22:41:35 CEST schrieb Heiko Stuebner:
> >> > Am Sonntag, 26. März 2017, 22:13:08 CEST schrieb Heiko Stuebner:
> >> > > Am Sonntag, 26. März 2017, 14:00:51 CEST schrieb Simon Glass:
> >> > > > Hi Heiko,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On 26 March 2017 at 13:59, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> >> > > > > Hi Heiko,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On 26 March 2017 at 13:06, Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote:
> >> > > > >> Hi Simon,
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> Am Samstag, 25. März 2017, 20:39:08 CEST schrieb Simon Glass:
> >> > > > >>> On 23 March 2017 at 17:41, Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote:
> >> > > > >>> > The Rock is a RK3188 based single board computer by Radxa.
> >> > > > >>> > Currently it still relies on the proprietary DDR init and
> >> > > > >>> > cannot use the generic SPL, but at least is able to boot
> >> > > > >>> > a linux kernel and system up to a regular login prompt.
> >> > > > >>> >
> >> > > > >>> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de>
> >> > > > >>> > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> >> > > > >>> > Tested-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang at rock-chips.com>
> >> > > > >>> > ---
> >> > > > >>> > arch/arm/dts/Makefile | 1 +
> >> > > > >>> > arch/arm/dts/rk3188-radxarock.dts | 382 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> > > > >>> > arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3188/Kconfig | 11 +
> >> > > > >>> > board/radxa/rock/Kconfig | 15 ++
> >> > > > >>> > board/radxa/rock/MAINTAINERS | 6 +
> >> > > > >>> > board/radxa/rock/Makefile | 7 +
> >> > > > >>> > board/radxa/rock/rock.c | 7 +
> >> > > > >>> > configs/rock_defconfig | 58 ++++++
> >> > > > >>> > include/configs/rock.h | 30 +++
> >> > > > >>> > 9 files changed, 517 insertions(+)
> >> > > > >>> > create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/rk3188-radxarock.dts
> >> > > > >>> > create mode 100644 board/radxa/rock/Kconfig
> >> > > > >>> > create mode 100644 board/radxa/rock/MAINTAINERS
> >> > > > >>> > create mode 100644 board/radxa/rock/Makefile
> >> > > > >>> > create mode 100644 board/radxa/rock/rock.c
> >> > > > >>> > create mode 100644 configs/rock_defconfig
> >> > > > >>> > create mode 100644 include/configs/rock.h
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> I am still having trouble applying this patch. I get build errors:
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> arm: + rock
> >> > > > >>> +arch/arm/Makefile:22: CONFIG_CPU_V7 -march=armv7-a
> >> > > > >>> +make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'dts/dt.dtb', needed by
> >> > > > >>> 'tpl/u-boot-tpl.dtb'. Stop.
> >> > > > >>> +make[1]: *** [tpl/u-boot-tpl.bin] Error 2
> >> > > > >>> +make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
> >> > > > >>> 0 0 1 /1 rock
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> Also there seems to be a duplicate config:
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> arm: + rock
> >> > > > >>> +In file included from include/configs/rock.h:11:0,
> >> > > > >>> + from include/config.h:5,
> >> > > > >>> + from include/common.h:21,
> >> > > > >>> + from arch/arm/lib/asm-offsets.c:15:
> >> > > > >>> + #define CONFIG_SYS_THUMB_BUILD
> >> > > > >>> + ^
> >> > > > >>> + from lib/asm-offsets.c:15:
> >> > > > >>> +In file included from include/linux/kconfig.h:4:0,
> >> > > > >>> + from <command-line>:0:
> >> > > > >>> +include/generated/autoconf.h:10:0: note: this is the location of the
> >> > > > >>> previous definition
> >> > > > >>> + #define CONFIG_SYS_THUMB_BUILD 1
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> looks like this got run over by another Kconfig migration on march-18.
> >> > > > >> New patches (migration + rock board) coming up shortly.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Thanks - what toolchain are you using to test this?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Also I am still getting this error:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > buildman rock$
> >> > > > boards.cfg is up to date. Nothing to do.
> >> > > > Building current source for 1 boards (1 thread, 8 jobs per thread)
> >> > > > arm: + rock
> >> > > > +make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'dts/dt.dtb', needed by
> >> > > > 'tpl/u-boot-tpl.dtb'. Stop.
> >> > > > +make[1]: *** [tpl/u-boot-tpl.bin] Error 2
> >> > > > +make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
> >> > > > 0 0 1 /1 rock
> >> > >
> >> > > that is really strange.
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm building with the armhf cross-compiler from Debian testing, which is
> >> > >
> >> > > arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (Debian 6.3.0-5) 6.3.0 20170124
> >> > >
> >> > > My git history also is up-to-date it seems:
> >> > > 14ef0b180b rockchip: rk3188: Add Radxa Rock board
> >> > > d0348986cc rockchip: rk3188: follow THUMB_BUILD Kconfig migration
> >> > > 3bffe88d68 rockchip: video: Split out HDMI controller code
> >> > > a188a5a35c rockchip: i2c: Add compatibles for Rockchip Cortex-A9 socs
> >> > > 903fae5666 rockchip: rk3188: Setup the armclk in spl
> >> > > 7957cc4bd0 rockchip: clk: rk3188: Allow configuration of the armclk
> >> > >
> >> > > with 3bffe88d68 being your current head and my build commands being
> >> > >
> >> > > make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- clean
> >> > > make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- rock_defconfig
> >> > > make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf-
> >> >
> >> > that also works with a "make mrproper" before everything else.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > Strangely the tpl shouldn't require a dtb at all, as it needs to use
> >> > > OF_PLATDATA. Am I missing some config option somewhere?
> >> >
> >> > I also did play around a bit with buildman just now:
> >> >
> >> > At first I forgot the "$" after rock, so build everything with rock in the
> >> > name and the radxarock failed because the somewhat old 4.9 toolchain
> >> > used seems to produce a TPL image that is over the size constraints.
> >> > I.e. 1020 bytes on 4.9 vs. 792 bytes on 6.3.0 .
> >> >
> >> > When I drop the SPL_MAX_SIZE from rk3188_common.h for the TPL build
> >> > tools/buildman/buildman -P rock
> >> > builds 14 boards and finishes sucessfully including the radxarock.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Now when I try buildman -P rock$ I seem to also get the error about the
> >> > missing dts/dt.dtb , which does not occur in my regular builds and also
> >> > not when building the bigger number of boards. I guess I need to figure
> >> > out what is different in that case.
> >>
> >> sorry for spamming, but
> >>
> >> also when entering .bm-work/rock where buildman failed and doing just my
> >>
> >> make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf-
> >>
> >> in that directory created by buildman, produces perfectly fine images.
> >> (buildman does create the .config, so I'm just finishing the build, buildman
> >> failed at for unknown reasons)
> >
> > and a
> > tools/buildman/buildman -PVv -T1 -j1 rock$
> >
> > also finishes sucessfully, so it looks like that is more some sort of build
> > concurrency issue, with the platdata not being created in time for some
> > reason.
>
> Yes I think that is right. I will see if I can fix that.
>
> Re the toolchain, if I pull in this patch then I will likely cause a
> build breakable on common toolchains. What do you think is the best
> option? Can the TPL be shrunk a little with gcc 4.9?
I've added Tom for comments, executive summary:
- rk3188-tpl is size limited to 1020 bytes
- gcc 6.3 produces a rk3188-tpl of 792 bytes
- gcc 4.9 makes it 1020 bytes
- buildman seems to always use gcc-4.9
- rk3188 board does not compile with buildman
Isn't holding on to a pretty old compiler for everything somewhat
strange? ;-)
I think the recent memset change in commit
c67c8c604b6c ("board_init.c: Always use memset()")
did hurt us the most sizewise, as we're now using the libgeneric memset
which is quite a bit bigger than the naive fallback that existed in
board_init.c before.
Reverting and using the naive memset again brings us down to 952 bytes
again even on gcc-4.9 .
I guess I could just remove the TPL_LIBGENERIC option again and provide
a similarly small/naive memset in the rk3188 tpl board?
################
Or maybe just check if the size limit in u-boot-spl.lds is actually correct.
In our example gcc-4.9 produces a 1020bytes result and the SPL_SIZE_LIMIT
is set to (0x400 - 0x4) = 1020, so of course doing
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot-spl.lds b/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot-spl.lds
index 068163b73a..c9643efd96 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot-spl.lds
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/u-boot-spl.lds
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ SECTIONS
}
#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE)
-ASSERT(__image_copy_end - __image_copy_start < (CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE), \
+ASSERT(__image_copy_end - __image_copy_start <= (CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE), \
"SPL image too big");
#endif
does look somewhat correct. But of course that rides way to much on the
edge when every additional byte will break the build.
Heiko
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list