[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4 v4] dm: test: Add test for device removal

[Stefan Roese]

Add a test for the correct device removal. Currently two different ways
for device removal are supported:

- Normal device removal via the device_remove() API
- Removal via selective device driver flags (DM_FLAG_ACTIVE_DMA)

This new test "remove_active_dma" adds tests cases for those both ways
of removal. This is done by adding a new test driver, which has this
flag set.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
---
v4:
- Added explicit test that a device without the active DMA flags is not
  removed upon the active DMA remove call. For this, a new test driver
  is added (test_act_dma_drv).

v2:
- New patch in patchset

 test/dm/core.c        | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 test/dm/test-driver.c | 11 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+)

diff --git a/test/dm/core.c b/test/dm/core.c
index 07b2419ea4..50ee41b9e2 100644
--- a/test/dm/core.c
+++ b/test/dm/core.c
@@ -67,6 +67,10 @@ static struct driver_info driver_info_pre_reloc = {
 	.platdata = &test_pdata_pre_reloc,
 };
 
+static struct driver_info driver_info_act_dma = {
+	.name = "test_act_dma_drv",
+};
+
 void dm_leak_check_start(struct unit_test_state *uts)
 {
 	uts->start = mallinfo();
@@ -656,6 +660,68 @@ static int dm_test_pre_reloc(struct unit_test_state *uts)
 }
 DM_TEST(dm_test_pre_reloc, 0);
 
+/*
+ * Test that removal of devices, either via the "normal" device_remove()
+ * API or via the device driver selective flag works as expected
+ */
+static int dm_test_remove_active_dma(struct unit_test_state *uts)
+{
+	struct dm_test_state *dms = uts->priv;
+	struct udevice *dev;
+
+	ut_assertok(device_bind_by_name(dms->root, false, &driver_info_act_dma,
+					&dev));
+	ut_assert(dev);
+
+	/* Probe the device */
+	ut_assertok(device_probe(dev));
+
+	/* Test if device is active right now */
+	ut_asserteq(true, device_active(dev));
+
+	/* Remove the device via selective remove flag */
+	dm_remove_devices_flags(DM_REMOVE_ACTIVE_ALL);
+
+	/* Test if device is inactive right now */
+	ut_asserteq(false, device_active(dev));
+
+	/* Probe the device again */
+	ut_assertok(device_probe(dev));
+
+	/* Test if device is active right now */
+	ut_asserteq(true, device_active(dev));
+
+	/* Remove the device via "normal" remove API */
+	ut_assertok(device_remove(dev, DM_REMOVE_NORMAL));
+
+	/* Test if device is inactive right now */
+	ut_asserteq(false, device_active(dev));
+
+	/*
+	 * Test if a device without the active DMA flags is not removed upon
+	 * the active DMA remove call
+	 */
+	ut_assertok(device_unbind(dev));
+	ut_assertok(device_bind_by_name(dms->root, false, &driver_info_manual,
+					&dev));
+	ut_assert(dev);
+
+	/* Probe the device */
+	ut_assertok(device_probe(dev));
+
+	/* Test if device is active right now */
+	ut_asserteq(true, device_active(dev));
+
+	/* Remove the device via selective remove flag */
+	dm_remove_devices_flags(DM_REMOVE_ACTIVE_ALL);
+
+	/* Test if device is still active right now */
+	ut_asserteq(true, device_active(dev));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+DM_TEST(dm_test_remove_active_dma, 0);
+
 static int dm_test_uclass_before_ready(struct unit_test_state *uts)
 {
 	struct uclass *uc;
diff --git a/test/dm/test-driver.c b/test/dm/test-driver.c
index d10af51147..2b432a71fd 100644
--- a/test/dm/test-driver.c
+++ b/test/dm/test-driver.c
@@ -157,3 +157,14 @@ U_BOOT_DRIVER(test_pre_reloc_drv) = {
 	.unbind	= test_manual_unbind,
 	.flags	= DM_FLAG_PRE_RELOC,
 };
+
+U_BOOT_DRIVER(test_act_dma_drv) = {
+	.name	= "test_act_dma_drv",
+	.id	= UCLASS_TEST,
+	.ops	= &test_manual_ops,
+	.bind	= test_manual_bind,
+	.probe	= test_manual_probe,
+	.remove	= test_manual_remove,
+	.unbind	= test_manual_unbind,
+	.flags	= DM_FLAG_ACTIVE_DMA,
+};
-- 
2.12.2