[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] armv7m: add instruction & data cache support
Marek Vasut
marex at denx.de
Mon Mar 27 21:27:08 UTC 2017
On 03/27/2017 10:41 PM, Vikas Manocha wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On 03/27/2017 01:34 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 03/27/2017 10:02 PM, Vikas Manocha wrote:
>>> This patch adds armv7m instruction & data cache support.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vikas Manocha <vikas.manocha at st.com>
>>> cc: Christophe KERELLO <christophe.kerello at st.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changed in v4:
>>> - invalidate_dcache_range() & flush_dcache_range() function added.
>>> - blank lines added.
>>> - comments added for registers, functions & barriers.
>>> - register names changed for better clarity.
>>> - typecasting moved to macro definitions.
>>>
>>> Changed in v3:
>>> - uint32 replcaed with u32.
>>> - multiple read of hardware register replaced with single.
>>> - pointers replaced with macros for base address.
>>> - register names added as comment for system control block registers.
>>>
>>> Changed in v2:
>>> - changed strucures for memory mapped cache registers to macros
>>> - added lines better readability.
>>> - replaced magic numbers with macros.
>>>
>>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/Makefile | 3 +-
>>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/cache.c | 336 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/include/asm/armv7m.h | 26 +++-
>>> arch/arm/lib/Makefile | 2 +
>>> 4 files changed, 363 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/cache.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/Makefile b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/Makefile
>>> index e1a6c40..93c9085 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/Makefile
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/Makefile
>>> @@ -6,6 +6,5 @@
>>> #
>>>
>>> extra-y := start.o
>>> -obj-y += cpu.o
>>> -
>>> +obj-y += cpu.o cache.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_SYS_ARCH_TIMER) += systick-timer.o
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/cache.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/cache.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..162cfe3
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7m/cache.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,336 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * (C) Copyright 2017
>>> + * Vikas Manocha, ST Micoelectronics, vikas.manocha at st.com.
>>> + *
>>> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#include <common.h>
>>> +#include <errno.h>
>>> +#include <asm/armv7m.h>
>>> +#include <asm/io.h>
>>> +
>>> +/* Cache maintenance operation registers */
>>> +
>>> +#define V7M_CACHE_REG_ICIALLU ((u32 *)(V7M_CACHE_MAINT_BASE + 0x00))
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Drop this whole part,
>> it's a register offset, not address. Just calculate the address
>> in-place. The cast is also not needed.
>
> These are fixed addresses in armv7m architecture.
So what ?
> In place calculations were replaced by
> this fixed address macro as per your comment.
And then one of the two things will happen:
a) these addresses will be moved
b) someone will look at the surrounding code, where _REG_ means register
offset all over the place and will screw things up ...
> casting was moved here from code as per Simon's suggestion on on v3.
>
>>
>>> +#define INVAL_ICACHE_POU 0
>>> +#define V7M_CACHE_REG_ICIMVALU ((u32 *)(V7M_CACHE_MAINT_BASE + 0x08))
>>> +#define V7M_CACHE_REG_DCIMVAC ((u32 *)(V7M_CACHE_MAINT_BASE + 0x0C))
>>> +#define V7M_CACHE_REG_DCISW ((u32 *)(V7M_CACHE_MAINT_BASE + 0x10))
>>> +#define V7M_CACHE_REG_DCCMVAU ((u32 *)(V7M_CACHE_MAINT_BASE + 0x14))
>>> +#define V7M_CACHE_REG_DCCMVAC ((u32 *)(V7M_CACHE_MAINT_BASE + 0x18))
>>> +#define V7M_CACHE_REG_DCCSW ((u32 *)(V7M_CACHE_MAINT_BASE + 0x1C))
>>> +#define V7M_CACHE_REG_DCCIMVAC ((u32 *)(V7M_CACHE_MAINT_BASE + 0x20))
>>> +#define V7M_CACHE_REG_DCCISW ((u32 *)(V7M_CACHE_MAINT_BASE + 0x24))
>>> +#define WAYS_SHIFT 30
>>> +#define SETS_SHIFT 5
>>> +
>>> +/* armv7m processor feature registers */
>>> +
>>> +#define V7M_PROC_REG_CLIDR ((u32 *)(V7M_PROC_FTR_BASE + 0x00))
>>> +#define V7M_PROC_REG_CTR ((u32 *)(V7M_PROC_FTR_BASE + 0x04))
>>> +#define V7M_PROC_REG_CCSIDR ((u32 *)(V7M_PROC_FTR_BASE + 0x08))
>>> +#define MASK_NUM_WAYS GENMASK(12, 3)
>>> +#define MASK_NUM_SETS GENMASK(27, 13)
>>> +#define CLINE_SIZE_MASK GENMASK(2, 0)
>>> +#define NUM_WAYS_SHIFT 3
>>> +#define NUM_SETS_SHIFT 13
>>
>> Well use those macros in MASK_* above ...
>
> macros are being used, shifts are required after masking.
Then look at the GENMASK() above and the hardcoded values ...
>>> +#define V7M_PROC_REG_CSSELR ((u32 *)(V7M_PROC_FTR_BASE + 0x0C))
>>> +#define SEL_I_OR_D BIT(0)
>>> +
>>> +enum cache_type {
>>> + DCACHE,
>>> + ICACHE,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +/* PoU : Point of Unification, Poc: Point of Coherency */
>>> +enum cache_action {
>>> + INVALIDATE_POU, /* i-cache invalidate by address */
>>> + INVALIDATE_POC, /* d-cache invalidate by address */
>>> + INVALIDATE_SET_WAY, /* d-cache invalidate by sets/ways */
>>> + FLUSH_POU, /* d-cache clean by address to the PoU */
>>> + FLUSH_POC, /* d-cache clean by address to the PoC */
>>> + FLUSH_SET_WAY, /* d-cache clean by sets/ways */
>>> + FLUSH_INVAL_POC, /* d-cache clean & invalidate by addr to PoC */
>>> + FLUSH_INVAL_SET_WAY, /* d-cache clean & invalidate by set/ways */
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_SYS_DCACHE_OFF
>>> +struct dcache_config {
>>> + u32 ways;
>>> + u32 sets;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static void get_cache_ways_sets(struct dcache_config *cache)
>>> +{
>>> + u32 cache_size_id = readl(V7M_PROC_REG_CCSIDR);
>>> +
>>> + cache->ways = (cache_size_id & MASK_NUM_WAYS) >> NUM_WAYS_SHIFT;
>>> + cache->sets = (cache_size_id & MASK_NUM_SETS) >> NUM_SETS_SHIFT;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Return the io register to perform required cache action like clean or clean
>>> + * & invalidate by sets/ways.
>>> + */
>>> +static u32 *get_action_reg_set_ways(enum cache_action action)
>>> +{
>>> + switch (action) {
>>> + case INVALIDATE_SET_WAY:
>>> + return V7M_CACHE_REG_DCISW;
>>> + case FLUSH_SET_WAY:
>>> + return V7M_CACHE_REG_DCCSW;
>>> + case FLUSH_INVAL_SET_WAY:
>>> + return V7M_CACHE_REG_DCCISW;
>>> + default:
>>> + break;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Return the io register to perform required cache action like clean or clean
>>> + * & invalidate by adddress or range.
>>> + */
>>> +static u32 *get_action_reg_range(enum cache_action action)
>>> +{
>>> + switch (action) {
>>> + case INVALIDATE_POU:
>>> + return V7M_CACHE_REG_ICIMVALU;
>>> + case INVALIDATE_POC:
>>> + return V7M_CACHE_REG_DCIMVAC;
>>> + case FLUSH_POU:
>>> + return V7M_CACHE_REG_DCCMVAU;
>>> + case FLUSH_POC:
>>> + return V7M_CACHE_REG_DCCMVAC;
>>> + case FLUSH_INVAL_POC:
>>> + return V7M_CACHE_REG_DCCIMVAC;
>>> + default:
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static u32 get_cline_size(enum cache_type type)
>>> +{
>>> + u32 size;
>>> +
>>> + if (type == DCACHE)
>>> + clrbits_le32(V7M_PROC_REG_CSSELR, BIT(SEL_I_OR_D));
>>> + else if (type == ICACHE)
>>> + setbits_le32(V7M_PROC_REG_CSSELR, BIT(SEL_I_OR_D));
>>> + /* Make sure cache selection is effective for next memory access */
>>> + dsb();
>>> +
>>> + size = readl(V7M_PROC_REG_CCSIDR) & CLINE_SIZE_MASK;
>>> + /* Size enocoded as 2 less than log(no_of_words_in_cache_line) base 2 */
>>> + size = 1 << (size + 2);
>>> + debug("cache line size is %d\n", size);
>>> +
>>> + return size;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/* Perform the action like invalidate/clean on a range of cache addresses */
>>> +static int action_cache_range(enum cache_action action, u32 start_addr,
>>> + int64_t size)
>>> +{
>>> + u32 cline_size;
>>> + u32 *action_reg;
>>> + enum cache_type type;
>>
>> Does this ever check whether start_addr and size is unaligned ?
>
> address alignment is being done below before cache action.
Ah, so we hide bugs which are introduced by unaligned accesses ? Well
please remove that and add address alignment check like the rest ...
>> Also, you use u32 all over the place, but size is signed-i64 ? Why?
>
> Yes it is for condition "size > cline_size" when range/size is 4GB.
Divide that by page size and you no longer need to use 64bit type on
32bit system ...
>>> + action_reg = get_action_reg_range(action);
>>> + if (!action_reg)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + if (action == INVALIDATE_POU)
>>> + type = ICACHE;
>>> + else
>>> + type = DCACHE;
>>> +
>>> + /* Cache line size is minium size for the cache action */
>>> + cline_size = get_cline_size(type);
>>> + /* Align start address to cache line boundary */
>>> + start_addr &= ~(cline_size - 1);
>>> + debug("total size for cache action = %llx\n", size);
>>> + do {
>>> + writel(start_addr, action_reg);
>>> + size -= cline_size;
>>> + start_addr += cline_size;
>>> + } while (size > cline_size);
>>> +
>>> + /* Make sure cache action is effective for next memory access */
>>> + dsb();
>>> + isb(); /* Make sure instruction stream sees it */
>>> + debug("cache action on range done\n");
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>
>>> -#define V7M_SCB_BASE 0xE000ED00
>>> -#define V7M_MPU_BASE 0xE000ED90
>>> +/* armv7m fixed base addresses */
>>> +#define V7M_SCS_BASE 0xE000E000
>>
>> Is all of this really used in the code ?
>
> Not all of them, it is for the sake of armv7m address space completeness.
Not sure we need them all then ...
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list