[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 14/18] sunxi: Pine64: defconfig: enable SPL FIT support

[Maxime Ripard]

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:17:31PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 29/03/17 07:57, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:45:22AM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> >> The Pine64 (and all other 64-bit Allwinner boards) need to load an
> >> ARM Trusted Firmware image beside the actual U-Boot proper.
> >> This can now be easily achieved by using the just extended SPL FIT
> >> loading support, so enable it in the Pine64 defconfig.
> >> Also add the FIT image as a build target to 64-bit sunxi board to
> >> trigger the respective Makefile rules.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com>
> >> ---
> >>  configs/pine64_plus_defconfig  | 6 ++++++
> >>  include/configs/sunxi-common.h | 4 ++++
> >>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/configs/pine64_plus_defconfig b/configs/pine64_plus_defconfig
> >> index 92bda60..8a90579 100644
> >> --- a/configs/pine64_plus_defconfig
> >> +++ b/configs/pine64_plus_defconfig
> >> @@ -3,9 +3,14 @@ CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI=y
> >>  CONFIG_MACH_SUN50I=y
> >>  CONFIG_RESERVE_ALLWINNER_BOOT0_HEADER=y
> >>  CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="sun50i-a64-pine64-plus"
> >> +CONFIG_OF_LIST="sun50i-a64-pine64 sun50i-a64-pine64-plus"
> >>  # CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_CLEAR_ON_INIT is not set
> >>  CONFIG_CONSOLE_MUX=y
> >>  CONFIG_SPL=y
> >> +CONFIG_FIT=y
> >> +CONFIG_SPL_FIT=y
> >> +CONFIG_SPL_LOAD_FIT=y
> >> +CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIBFDT=y
> > 
> > Again, this doesn't make any sense to enable it in *all* our
> > defconfigs. If this is something that should be enabled by default for
> > the A64 support, then do so in Kconfig directly.
> 
> Oh sorry, I think I completely misunderstood you last time.
> Indeed this makes sense, especially with more defconfigs for A64/H5
> boards coming up.
> 
> I will think about a solution that makes Icenowy happy as well,
> something like BOARD_NEEDS_SPL_FIT or so - though a simple "select"
> sounds tempting ;-)

Throwing a bunch of select to reduce the number of options to enable
would definitely be welcome indeed, at least between all the SPL_FIT*
options.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com