[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: socfpga: boot0 hook: remove macro from boot0 header file
Marek Vasut
marex at denx.de
Fri Mar 31 11:12:47 UTC 2017
On 03/30/2017 03:22 AM, chee skywind wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>
>> On 03/29/2017 05:49 AM, tien.fong.chee at intel.com wrote:
>>> From: "Chee, Tien Fong" <tien.fong.chee at intel.com>
>>>
>>> Commit ce62e57fc571 ("ARM: boot0 hook: remove macro, include whole
>>> header file") miss out cleaning macro in this header file, and this
>>> has broken implementation of a boot header capability in socfpga
>>> SPL. Remove the macro in this file, and recovering it back
>>> to proper functioning.
>>>
>>> Fixes: ce62e57fc571 ("ARM: boot0 hook: remove macro, include whole
>>> header file")
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chee, Tien Fong <tien.fong.chee at intel.com>
>>
>> Patch looks good, minor nit below.
>>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/boot0.h | 24
>> ++++++++++--------------
>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/boot0.h
>> b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/boot0.h
>>> index aaada31..22d9e7f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/boot0.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/boot0.h
>>> @@ -8,21 +8,17 @@
>>> #define __BOOT0_H
>>>
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
>>> -#define ARM_SOC_BOOT0_HOOK \
>>> - .balignl 64,0xf33db33f; \
>>> - \
>>> - .word 0x1337c0d3; /* SoCFPGA preloader validation word */ \
>>> - .word 0xc01df00d; /* Version, flags, length */ \
>>> - .word 0xcafec0d3; /* Checksum, zero-pad */ \
>>> - nop; \
>>> - \
>>> - b reset; /* SoCFPGA jumps here */ \
>>> - nop; \
>>> - nop; \
>>> + .balignl 64,0xf33db33f;
>>> +
>>> + .word 0x1337c0d3; /* SoCFPGA preloader validation word */
>>> + .word 0xc01df00d; /* Version, flags, length */
>>> + .word 0xcafec0d3; /* Checksum, zero-pad */
>>> nop;
>>> -#else
>>> -#define ARM_SOC_BOOT0_HOOK
>>> -#endif
>>>
>>> + b reset; /* SoCFPGA jumps here */
>>> + nop;
>>> + nop;
>>> + nop;
>>
>> Correct me if I'm wrong, but did you add one more "nop" here ?
>>
>> no, i din't add extra "nop" here. There are 3 "nop" from original code
> after "b reset".
Ah sorry, I see, it's just the patch being generated in a funny way.
Thanks for double-checking.
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list