[U-Boot] [PATCH V2] ARM: imx6: Add DHCOM i.MX6 PDK board support

[Marek Vasut]

On 10/10/2017 03:32 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 1:21 AM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>> Add support for the DHCOM i.MX6 PDK board. This board has:
>> - FEC ethernet
>> - EHCI USB host
>> - 3x SDMMC
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
>> Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic at denx.de>
>> ---
>> V2: Use get_cpu_type() and imx_get_mac_from_fuse()
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-imx/mx6/Kconfig             |  10 +
>>  board/dhelectronics/dh_imx6/Kconfig       |  12 +
>>  board/dhelectronics/dh_imx6/MAINTAINERS   |   7 +
>>  board/dhelectronics/dh_imx6/Makefile      |  11 +
>>  board/dhelectronics/dh_imx6/dh_imx6.c     | 437 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  board/dhelectronics/dh_imx6/dh_imx6_spl.c | 399 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  configs/dh_imx6_defconfig                 |  51 ++++
>>  include/configs/dh_imx6.h                 | 191 +++++++++++++
>>  8 files changed, 1118 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 board/dhelectronics/dh_imx6/Kconfig
>>  create mode 100644 board/dhelectronics/dh_imx6/MAINTAINERS
>>  create mode 100644 board/dhelectronics/dh_imx6/Makefile
>>  create mode 100644 board/dhelectronics/dh_imx6/dh_imx6.c
>>  create mode 100644 board/dhelectronics/dh_imx6/dh_imx6_spl.c
>>  create mode 100644 configs/dh_imx6_defconfig
>>  create mode 100644 include/configs/dh_imx6.h
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mx6/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mx6/Kconfig
>> index 540f2b29b1..b82db3af22 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mx6/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mx6/Kconfig
>> @@ -129,6 +129,15 @@ config TARGET_COLIBRI_IMX6
>>         select DM_SERIAL
>>         select DM_THERMAL
>>
>> +config TARGET_DHCOMIMX6
>> +       bool "dh_imx6"
>> +       select BOARD_LATE_INIT
>> +       select BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F
>> +       select SUPPORT_SPL
>> +       select DM
>> +       select DM_THERMAL
>> +       imply CMD_SPL
> 
> I would suggest to add new boards with DTS along with enabling
> dm-driven drivers, this would eventually improve i.MX tree toward
> using new feature set.

Enabling unused stuff and adding bloat ? Nope :)

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut