[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] sunxi: Fix boot of Cubietruk and al.

[Maxime Ripard]

Hi Jagan,

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 03:25:59PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> I'm personally feel trimming un(non)used bits(which might use in
> future or not) is not a good idea.why can't we have TPL because even
> adding Falcon might also increase the size.

As far as I understand it, the TPL is just an extra step between the
SPL and the main U-Boot binary.

I'm not exactly sure how that would allow us to increase the size of
the main U-Boot binary. Can you elaborate?

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20171025/78003c43/attachment.sig>