[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 06/20] common: Generic firmware loader for file system

Lukasz Majewski lukma at denx.de
Sun Oct 29 22:57:13 UTC 2017


Hi Marek,

> On 10/28/2017 11:43 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > Hi Marek,
> >   
> >> On 10/27/2017 12:35 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> >> [...]  
> >>>>>>>>>  common/Makefile   |   2 +
> >>>>>>>>>  common/load_fs.c  | 163
> >>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>>>>  include/load_fs.h |  40 ++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>>>>  3 files changed, 205 insertions(+)
> >>>>>>>>>  create mode 100644 common/load_fs.c
> >>>>>>>>>  create mode 100644 include/load_fs.h  
> >>>>>>>> There is alot of change here and the commit message doesn't
> >>>>>>>> tell
> >>>>>>>> me anything! Please describe, in detail, what your patch is
> >>>>>>>> doing.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Also you need to include more people in the review path for
> >>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>> patch.  
> >>>>>> These are the code factored out from splash loader, contains
> >>>>>> some common functions which can be used by other file system
> >>>>>> loader such as
> >>>>>> fpga loadfs.  
> >>>>> Would it be possible to provide ./doc entry to explain how one
> >>>>> can use
> >>>>> this set of tools (splash/loadfs loaders) ?
> >>>>>  
> >>>> Sure. I will provide a./doc or comment in next version.
> >>>> Basically, the idea is factoring out the common code which
> >>>> specific handlle image in file format loading from flash to
> >>>> target(memory/device) between splash loader and fpga loadfs. So,
> >>>> you will see i have declared a few weak functions, which is used
> >>>> for defined speficic handling algorithm such as get_file, and
> >>>> fs_loading.
> >>>>
> >>>> Initially, my plan is creating a more generic function name and
> >>>> geneirc file name, then replacing those splash_loader fs at
> >>>> separate patch set.
> >>>>
> >>>> Now, i am working directly on splash loader. Anyway, i also like
> >>>> more discussion and good comments while i am working on it.  
> >>>
> >>> I've asked for a documentation, since I do have one idea in the
> >>> back of my head.
> >>>
> >>> I'm wondering if other SoCs could benefit from this solution? For
> >>> example when we treat the FPGA as a DSP processor which needs to
> >>> have bitstream ( or better firmware ) loaded to some physical
> >>> address. I'm also wondering if your work would allow for
> >>> start/stop of the code execution?  
> >>
> >> This is supposed to be a firmware loader (kind-of like the firmware
> >> loader in Linux),  
> > 
> > So in principle I should be able to load any bitstream (firmware)  
> 
> Yes, using this framework.
> 
> > to
> > any FPGA/SoC/whatever.  
> 
> No, this part is up to you to implement.
> 
> > I do have in mind the ADI's SHARC DSP cores...  
> 
> The part which calls the firmware loader API and pushes it into those
> cores is up to you to implement.
> 
> >> so I have no idea what you mean by "start/stop"
> >> execution.  
> > 
> > Ok. This can be done in a separate driver. No issues with that.  
> 
> IMO it indeed should.

Ok.

> 
> >>> It would be best to have some kind of common code and extensions
> >>> per soc/architecture.  
> >>
> >> I can't see a usecase for that.  
> > 
> > The use case would be to reuse/tweak this code to be able to load
> > firmware for the SHARC DSP processors.  
> 
> I think your driver will use the firmware loader indeed, but this
> functionality you described would be part of some driver for that
> hardware, not the FW loader.

Unfortunately, there is no such "driver" available from the vendor -
hence I'm poking around to see what can be "reused".



Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

--

DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20171029/21d6d245/attachment.sig>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list