[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 29/32] fsl_esdhc: Update usdhc driver to support i.MX8
Peng Fan
peng.fan at nxp.com
Tue Jul 24 00:45:48 UTC 2018
Hi Fabio,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:festevam at gmail.com]
> Sent: 2018年7月24日 3:27
> To: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic at denx.de>; Fabio Estevam
> <fabio.estevam at nxp.com>; U-Boot-Denx <u-boot at lists.denx.de>; dl-linux-imx
> <linux-imx at nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 29/32] fsl_esdhc: Update usdhc driver to
> support i.MX8
>
> Hi Peng,
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:04 AM, Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com> wrote:
>
> > There is i.MX8/8X/8M, 8M is for i.MX8MQ and i.MX8MM i.MX8/8X has
> > different SoC architecture compared with i.MX8M, such as there is SCU
> > inside i.MX8/8X.
> > So add a new macro dedicated for i.MX8/8X.
>
> Yes, I understand the differences between the MX8 family.
>
> Couldn't you make CONFIG_IMX8 instead of CONFIG_ARCH_IMX8 for
> consistency?
In V1, I use CONFIG_IMX8, but I think there is no need to use it, because
CONFIG_ARCH_IMX8 could do same thing.
I could revert to use CONFIG_IMX8, since you prefer it.
>
> Also, for consistency: should CONFIG_MX8M be changed to CONFIG_IMX8M?
Yes. CONFIG_MX8M also need to be changed to CONFIG_IMX8M, but not in this patchset.
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> Thanks
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list