[U-Boot] [PATCH 11/20] w1: enumerate sandbox driver if configured

Simon Glass sjg at chromium.org
Tue Jul 24 15:28:30 UTC 2018


Hi Maxime,

On 24 July 2018 at 00:58, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard at bootlin.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 05:48:25PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 20 July 2018 at 08:01, Lukasz Majewski <lukma at denx.de> wrote:
>> > Hi Eugen,
>> >
>> > Thanks for (re-)bringing the One wire support to u-boot.
>> >
>> >> Add a sandbox eeprom on the bus as a device, if sandbox driver is
>> >> configured.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev at microchip.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  drivers/w1/w1-uclass.c | 5 +++++
>> >>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/w1/w1-uclass.c b/drivers/w1/w1-uclass.c
>> >> index cfddda3..e58c1ca 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/w1/w1-uclass.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/w1/w1-uclass.c
>> >> @@ -142,6 +142,11 @@ static int w1_enumerate(struct udevice *bus)
>> >>               }
>> >>       }
>> >>
>> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_W1_EEPROM_SANDBOX
>> >> +     /* before we are finished, add a sandbox device if we can */
>> >> +     w1_new_device(bus, W1_FAMILY_EEP_SANDBOX);
>> >> +#endif
>> >
>> > IMHO we shouldn't mix the sandbox code with production (on boards) code.
>> >
>> > Maybe Simon (+CCed) could provide some more input here?
>>
>> I have not seen this series. But new devices should be created
>> automatically based on them being in the device tree. So you should
>> just be able to add them there.
>
> 1-Wire is discoverable, so there's no device nodes in the DT.

Well there should be. See for example PCI, USB, I2C and SPI :-)

Regards,
Simon


More information about the U-Boot mailing list