[U-Boot] [U-Boot, 1/2] env: Include bootdelay in environment if negative

Alex Kiernan alex.kiernan at gmail.com
Thu Jul 26 08:31:08 UTC 2018


On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 11:34 PM Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 12:38:15PM +0000, Alex Kiernan wrote:
>
> > The test for (CONFIG_BOOTDELAY >= 0) has been in U-Boot since the
> > beginning, but the meaning of it has changed over time. Allow the
> > default to be set for any value, including -ve ones. This allows
> > (for example) CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE to have values for bootdelay in
> > its compiled in environment.
> >
> > The only thing this changes is where the default for bootdelay can be
> > fetched from; before this change you get a compiled in default, after
> > you'll pull it from the default value in the environment, but both values
> > will be the same. Also if there's a value set in the environment then
> > that will take precedence (as before).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Kiernan <alex.kiernan at gmail.com>
>
> Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
>

I've just realised that if you had an existing hardcoded bootdelay= to
cover the case where it wasn't being inserted through env_defaults you
would now end up with two.

However checking there's 6 boards (9 configs) which possibly have this
problem, but none of them have a -ve value for CONFIG_BOOTDELAY. If I
revert this change and then grep out bootdelay from the generated
environments for those configs, 7 have duplicates before this change
(the last two are odroid-c2 and odroid-xu3 which are fine):

cl-som-am57x/uboot.env: bootdelay=2
cl-som-am57x/uboot.env: bootdelay=3
cm_t54/uboot.env: bootdelay=3
cm_t54/uboot.env: bootdelay=3
display5_factory/uboot.env: bootdelay=3
display5_factory/uboot.env: bootdelay=1
display5/uboot.env: bootdelay=2
display5/uboot.env: bootdelay=1
nas220/uboot.env: bootdelay=3
nas220/uboot.env: bootdelay=-1
odroid/uboot.env: bootdelay=2
odroid/uboot.env: bootdelay=0
vinco/uboot.env: bootdelay=3
vinco/uboot.env: bootdelay=0

I don't think there's anything here for me to fix up, but the
maintainers of those boards probably want to figure out which of the
bootdelay values they wanted.

I wonder if we want some QA process off the end of the build (or in
buildman?) which verifies the extracted environment for duplicate
entries.

--
Alex Kiernan


More information about the U-Boot mailing list