[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] usb: sunxi: sun50i: enable OHCI0 clock when OHCI1 is in use

Marek Vasut marex at denx.de
Wed Jun 6 15:13:48 UTC 2018


On 06/06/2018 05:12 PM, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 2:02 AM, Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>> On 06/06/2018 05:38 AM, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
>>> On A64 OHCI1 clock source is OHCI0 clock, so we need to enable OHCI0
>>> clock when OHCI1 is in use.
>>>
>>> Fixes commit dd3228170ad7 ("usb: sunxi: Switch to use generic-phy")
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul at gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/usb/host/ohci-sunxi.c | 7 ++++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-sunxi.c b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-sunxi.c
>>> index ce2b47a5c4..5661557a3d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-sunxi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-sunxi.c
>>> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ static int ohci_usb_probe(struct udevice *dev)
>>>       struct ohci_sunxi_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
>>>       struct ohci_regs *regs = (struct ohci_regs *)devfdt_get_addr(dev);
>>>       int extra_ahb_gate_mask = 0;
>>> +     int extra_usb_gate_mask = 0;
>>>       int phys, ret;
>>>
>>>       priv->ccm = (struct sunxi_ccm_reg *)SUNXI_CCM_BASE;
>>> @@ -78,13 +79,17 @@ no_phy:
>>>       extra_ahb_gate_mask = 1 << AHB_GATE_OFFSET_USB_EHCI0;
>>>  #endif
>>>       priv->usb_gate_mask = CCM_USB_CTRL_OHCI0_CLK;
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_SUN50I
>>> +     extra_usb_gate_mask = CCM_USB_CTRL_OHCI0_CLK;
>>> +#endif
>>>       priv->ahb_gate_mask <<= phys * AHB_CLK_DIST;
>>>       extra_ahb_gate_mask <<= phys * AHB_CLK_DIST;
>>>       priv->usb_gate_mask <<= phys;
>>>
>>>       setbits_le32(&priv->ccm->ahb_gate0,
>>>                    priv->ahb_gate_mask | extra_ahb_gate_mask);
>>> -     setbits_le32(&priv->ccm->usb_clk_cfg, priv->usb_gate_mask);
>>> +     setbits_le32(&priv->ccm->usb_clk_cfg,
>>> +                  priv->usb_gate_mask | extra_usb_gate_mask);
>>
>> Why is the SoC / compatible information not coming from DT instead ? Why
>> is the driver polluted by more ifdefs ?
> 
> Because this platform doesn't have DM clock driver yet. This code will
> be removed once this driver is implemented.

You don't need DM clock driver, you can check the compatible string I
think ?

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut


More information about the U-Boot mailing list