[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 05/13] efi: sandbox: Add distroboot support

Simon Glass sjg at chromium.org
Tue Jun 12 13:48:50 UTC 2018


Hi Alex,

On 12 June 2018 at 02:13, Alexander Graf <agraf at suse.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 12.06.18 07:26, Simon Glass wrote:
>> With sandbox these values depend on the host system. Let's assume that it
>> is x86_64 for now.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v5: None
>> Changes in v4: None
>> Changes in v3: None
>> Changes in v2: None
>>
>>  include/config_distro_bootcmd.h | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/config_distro_bootcmd.h b/include/config_distro_bootcmd.h
>> index d672e8ebe6..8d11f52da0 100644
>> --- a/include/config_distro_bootcmd.h
>> +++ b/include/config_distro_bootcmd.h
>> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@
>>  #elif defined(CONFIG_ARM)
>>  #define BOOTENV_EFI_PXE_ARCH "0xa"
>>  #define BOOTENV_EFI_PXE_VCI "PXEClient:Arch:00010:UNDI:003000"
>> -#elif defined(CONFIG_X86)
>> +#elif defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_SANDBOX)
>
> I was serious when I said I wanted to have a defined(__x86_64__) guard.
> Otherwise we'll expose incorrect information. And I doubt that anyone
> will catch it when porting sandbox to non-x86, because it doesn't error out.

OK I can do a warning but I cannot use the current guard, otherwise it
prevents sandbox even building on ARM hosts!

Regards,
Simon


More information about the U-Boot mailing list