[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] common: command: Use command_ret_t enum values instead of values
Michal Simek
michal.simek at xilinx.com
Fri Jun 22 06:33:30 UTC 2018
On 21.6.2018 21:45, Simon Glass wrote:
> On 21 June 2018 at 06:58, Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com> wrote:
>> Use enum command_ret_t types in cmd_process_error().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Move adding RET_USAGE to separate patch.
>>
>> common/command.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromum.org>
>
>
>> diff --git a/common/command.c b/common/command.c
>> index 52d47c133c3c..a4a8dc601acb 100644
>> --- a/common/command.c
>> +++ b/common/command.c
>> @@ -549,8 +549,8 @@ int cmd_process_error(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int err)
>> {
>> if (err) {
>> printf("Command '%s' failed: Error %d\n", cmdtp->name, err);
>> - return 1;
>> + return CMD_RET_FAILURE;
>> }
>>
>> - return 0;
>> + return CMD_RET_SUCCESS;
>
> I actually thing 0 is fine here. That is the definition of success.
and CMD_RET_SUCCESS has this 0 value too.
maybe would be worth to also change return type to enum command_ret_t
as is done for cmd_process.
For example ubi_remove_vol() in case of failure returs +ENODEV and others.
I thought that commands could return only 3 values convert by enum
command_ret_t. Or is it ok to return also different values?
Thanks,
Michal
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list