[U-Boot] [RESEND PATCHv4 2/9] armv8: lx2160a: add MMU table entries for PCIe

[Z.q. Hou]

Hi Bin,

Thanks a lot for your comments!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bin Meng [mailto:bmeng.cn at gmail.com]
> Sent: 2019年4月1日 13:32
> To: Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou at nxp.com>
> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; albert.u.boot at aribaud.net; Priyanka Jain
> <priyanka.jain at nxp.com>; York Sun <york.sun at nxp.com>;
> yamada.masahiro at socionext.com; Prabhakar Kushwaha
> <prabhakar.kushwaha at nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu at nxp.com>; M.h.
> Lian <minghuan.lian at nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCHv4 2/9] armv8: lx2160a: add MMU table entries
> for PCIe
> 
> Hi Zhiqiang,
> 
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 12:08 PM Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou at nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bin,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your comments!
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bin Meng [mailto:bmeng.cn at gmail.com]
> > > Sent: 2019年4月1日 11:22
> > > To: Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou at nxp.com>
> > > Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; albert.u.boot at aribaud.net; Priyanka Jain
> > > <priyanka.jain at nxp.com>; York Sun <york.sun at nxp.com>;
> > > sriram.dash at nxp.com; yamada.masahiro at socionext.com; Prabhakar
> > > Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha at nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu
> > > <mingkai.hu at nxp.com>; M.h. Lian <minghuan.lian at nxp.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCHv4 2/9] armv8: lx2160a: add MMU table
> > > entries for PCIe
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:24 AM Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou at nxp.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou at nxp.com>
> > > >
> > > > The lx2160a have up to 6 PCIe controllers and have different
> > > > address and size of PCIe region.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou at nxp.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > V4:
> > > >  - No change
> > > >
> > > >  arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c            | 12
> > > ++++++++++++
> > > >  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/cpu.h     |  2 ++
> > > >  .../include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/immap_lsch3.h  | 14
> > > > +++++++++++++-
> > > >  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c
> > > > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c
> > > > index 978d46b32f..2805e5f6f2 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c
> > > > @@ -257,6 +257,18 @@ static struct mm_region final_map[] = {
> > > >           PTE_BLOCK_MEMTYPE(MT_DEVICE_NGNRNE) |
> > > >           PTE_BLOCK_NON_SHARE | PTE_BLOCK_PXN |
> > > PTE_BLOCK_UXN
> > > >         },
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_LX2160A
> > > > +       { SYS_PCIE5_PHYS_ADDR, SYS_PCIE5_PHYS_ADDR,
> > > > +         SYS_PCIE5_PHYS_SIZE,
> > > > +         PTE_BLOCK_MEMTYPE(MT_DEVICE_NGNRNE) |
> > > > +         PTE_BLOCK_NON_SHARE | PTE_BLOCK_PXN |
> > > PTE_BLOCK_UXN
> > > > +       },
> > > > +       { SYS_PCIE6_PHYS_ADDR, SYS_PCIE6_PHYS_ADDR,
> > > > +         SYS_PCIE6_PHYS_SIZE,
> > > > +         PTE_BLOCK_MEMTYPE(MT_DEVICE_NGNRNE) |
> > > > +         PTE_BLOCK_NON_SHARE | PTE_BLOCK_PXN |
> > > PTE_BLOCK_UXN
> > > > +       },
> > > >  #endif
> > > >         { CONFIG_SYS_FSL_WRIOP1_BASE,
> > > CONFIG_SYS_FSL_WRIOP1_BASE,
> > > >           CONFIG_SYS_FSL_WRIOP1_SIZE, diff --git
> > > > a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/cpu.h
> > > > b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/cpu.h
> > > > index 89124cdb0e..bdeb62576c 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/cpu.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/cpu.h
> > > > @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@
> > > >  #define CONFIG_SYS_PCIE2_PHYS_SIZE     0x800000000
> > > >  #define CONFIG_SYS_PCIE3_PHYS_SIZE     0x800000000
> > > >  #define CONFIG_SYS_PCIE4_PHYS_SIZE     0x800000000
> > > > +#define SYS_PCIE5_PHYS_SIZE            0x800000000
> > > > +#define SYS_PCIE6_PHYS_SIZE            0x800000000
> > >
> > > Why are these macros not CONFIG_ prefixed?
> >
> > The new added macros with prefix CONFIG_ will result in build error, so we
> don't add the CONFIG_ prefix.
> >
> 
> I am curious how can such prefix cause build error?

It looks like the CFGCHK scripts reports the error as following: 
 CFGCHK  u-boot.cfg
Error: You must add new CONFIG options using Kconfig
The following new ad-hoc CONFIG options were detected:
CONFIG_SYS_PCIE5_ADDR

> 
> Regards,
> Bin

Thanks,
Zhiqiang