[U-Boot] [PATCH 10/13 v3] Makefile: Add Kconfig option CONFIG_SPL_IMAGE to select the SPL binary

Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com
Wed Apr 3 11:11:13 UTC 2019



On 03.04.2019 14:03, Eugen Hristev wrote:
> 
> 
> On 02.04.2019 11:57, Stefan Roese wrote:
> 
>>
>> This patch adds the CONFIG_SPL_IMAGE option to select the SPL image that
>> shall be used to generate the combined SPL + U-Boot image. The default
>> value is the current value "spl/u-boot-spl.bin".
>>
>> This patch also sets CONFIG_SPL_IMAGE to "spl/boot.bin" for AT91 targets
>> which use SPL NAND support (boot from NAND). For these build targets the
>> combined image "u-boot-with-spl.bin" is now automatically generated and
>> can be programmed into NAND as one single image (vs. SPL image and U-Boot
>> as 2 separate images).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de>
>> Cc: Heiko Schocher <hs at denx.de>
>> Cc: Andreas Bießmann <andreas at biessmann.org>
>> Cc: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev at microchip.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs at denx.de>
>> Tested on the taurus board:
>> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs at denx.de>
>> ---
>> v3:
>> - No change
>>
>> v2:
>> - No change
>>
>>   Kconfig  | 10 ++++++++++
>>   Makefile |  4 +++-
>>   2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Kconfig b/Kconfig
>> index 305b265ed7..7c2b86f1f3 100644
>> --- a/Kconfig
>> +++ b/Kconfig
>> @@ -224,6 +224,15 @@ config BUILD_ROM
>>         which are not shipped in the U-Boot source tree.
>>         Please, see doc/README.x86 for details.
>> +config SPL_IMAGE
>> +    string "SPL image filename that is generated"
>> +    default "spl/boot.bin" if ARCH_AT91 && SPL_NAND_SUPPORT
>> +    default "spl/u-boot-spl.bin"
>> +    help
>> +      The SPL image filename that is generated by the build process.
>> +      This image might be used to generated a combined image with
>> +      SPL and main U-Boot proper as well.
>> +
> 
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> If I try to just use menuconfig and change this value to something else, 
> build fails. The purpose of this Kconfig is to name the SPL filename as 
> per the config's desire ?
> 
> Or in fact is "which binary file to use to make the Combined SPL+U-BOOT 
> mega image" ?

Ok, the commit message explains it pretty well, but the Kconfig help is 
totally different... hence the confusion sorry.
So we need to either make a choice submenu in this Kconfig : either this 
or that; or, do exactly what the Kconfig says: rename the output binary 
into the value of this Kconfig.

Does this make sense ?


> 
> Eugen
> 
>>   config BUILD_TARGET
>>       string "Build target special images"
>>       default "u-boot-with-spl.sfp" if TARGET_SOCFPGA_ARRIA10
>> @@ -232,6 +241,7 @@ config BUILD_TARGET
>>       default "u-boot-elf.srec" if RCAR_GEN3
>>       default "u-boot.itb" if SPL_LOAD_FIT && ARCH_SUNXI
>>       default "u-boot.kwb" if KIRKWOOD
>> +    default "u-boot-with-spl.bin" if ARCH_AT91 && SPL_NAND_SUPPORT
>>       help
>>         Some SoCs need special image types (e.g. U-Boot binary
>>         with a special header) as build targets. By defining
>> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
>> index c1af9307b3..077bb6634e 100644
>> --- a/Makefile
>> +++ b/Makefile
>> @@ -1225,9 +1225,11 @@ else
>>   SPL_PAYLOAD := u-boot.bin
>>   endif
>> +SPL_IMAGE := $(CONFIG_SPL_IMAGE:"%"=%)
>> +
>>   OBJCOPYFLAGS_u-boot-with-spl.bin = -I binary -O binary \
>>                      --pad-to=$(CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO)
>> -u-boot-with-spl.bin: spl/u-boot-spl.bin $(SPL_PAYLOAD) FORCE
>> +u-boot-with-spl.bin: $(SPL_IMAGE) $(SPL_PAYLOAD) FORCE
>>       $(call if_changed,pad_cat)
>>   ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_LPC32XX)$(CONFIG_SPL),yy)
>>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list