[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] rockchip: use 'arch-rockchip' as header file path【请注意，邮件由sjg at google.com代发】

[Kever Yang]

Hi Simon,


On 04/04/2019 03:57 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Kever,
>
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 at 15:18, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>> Hi Kever,
>>
>> On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 21:01, Kever Yang <kever.yang at rock-chips.com> wrote:
>>> Rockchip use 'arch-rockchip' instead of arch-$(SOC) as common
>>> header file path, so that we can get the correct path directly.
>> Can you give a few more details on the reason for this change? I
>> cannot see the benefit?
> OK I figured it out from the context.
>
> Do you have interest in supporting multiple SoCs with a single build?

Is there other vendor support multiple SoCs?
For Rockchip platform, I don't think it's easy to do it now, the different
for different SoCs now:
- SoC init, eg. debug uart init, sgrf setting and other one time init
setting;
- clock driver;
- pinctrl driver, David still working on it, but the target is for
minimum size for
  each SoC, but not enable common code in pinctrl-core as much as possible,
  so this is the opposite way with support multiple SoCs support.

I would like to use common board/spl/tpl files first, and then step to
step to
see what we need to do.

Thanks,
- Kever
> Regards,
> Simon
>