[U-Boot] [PATCH] mtd: nand: let the raw NAND devices be compiled upon selection

[Jagan Teki]

Hi Miquel,

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 3:22 PM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jagan,
>
> Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com> wrote on Mon, 29 Oct 2018
> 10:07:28 +0100:
>
> > Hi Jagan,
> >
> > Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com> wrote on Tue, 23 Oct 2018
> > 16:40:05 +0530:
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 3:05 PM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Today way is to rely on CMD_NAND to be selected and from the root
> > > > Makefile compile what is in drivers/mtd/nand/raw.
> > > >
> > > > While this will work most of the time with decent configurations, it
> > > > is better to also compile this subsystem upon simple request in the
> > > > configuration. Otherwise, a user not selecting CMD_NAND but selecting
> > > > NAND and any of the controller drivers will not see their build. Fix
> > > > this weird situation by adding a single line in the nand/ directory
> > > > Kconfig file.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile | 1 +
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile b/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile
> > > > index a358bc680e..2c33447995 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile
> > > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile
> > > > @@ -2,4 +2,5 @@
> > > >
> > > >  nandcore-objs := core.o bbt.o
> > > >  obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_NAND_CORE) += nandcore.o
> > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_NAND) += raw/
> > >
> > > But we even source raw Kconfig path, isn't it? and also how about
> > > remove this from root Makefile?
> >
> > What do you mean by "we even source raw Kconfig path"? It was not
> > sourced before this modification unless CMD_NAND was selected.
> >
> > I agree we should also remove this link between a path being
> > compiled and a CMD_* symbol in the root Makefile. It will probably
> > produce a lot of errors though. I'll try when I'll have some time.
>
> Yet another patch you ignored. All these are real fixes, not just some
> kind of sandbox leisure, please consider this change.

1) Did I ignore any patches from you?

2) This change I just commented before and I think the same is
handling on your cleanup series, If I'm not wrong?

Jagan.