[U-Boot] [PULL] u-boot-socfpga/master

Simon Goldschmidt simon.k.r.goldschmidt at gmail.com
Thu Apr 11 20:07:06 UTC 2019


Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> schrieb am Do., 11. Apr. 2019, 21:59:

> On 4/11/19 9:30 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 11.04.19 21:03, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 08:49:38PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 11.04.19 20:20, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 08:19:38PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>>> On 4/11/19 8:17 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 04:46:28PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The following changes since commit
> >>>>>>> 3c99166441bf3ea325af2da83cfe65430b49c066:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>    Prepare v2019.04 (2019-04-08 21:40:40 -0400)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> are available in the Git repository at:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>    git://git.denx.de/u-boot-socfpga.git master
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> for you to fetch changes up to
> >>>>>>> ef8679b24ec6226b7198e06747ff047a16030ca4:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>    arm: dts: Stratix10: Add QSPI node (2019-04-09 13:11:06 +0200)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Arg, sorry I didn't see this sooner:
> >>>>>>         arm:  w+   socfpga_arria10
> >>>>>> +(socfpga_arria10)
> >>>>>> +(socfpga_arria10) WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for
> >>>>>> ALTERA_SDRAM
> >>>>>> +(socfpga_arria10)   Depends on [n]: RAM [=n] &&
> >>>>>> (TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 [=n] || TARGET_SOCFPGA_ARRIA10 [=y])
> >>>>>> +(socfpga_arria10)   Selected by [y]:
> >>>>>> +(socfpga_arria10)   - TARGET_SOCFPGA_ARRIA10 [=y] && ARM [=y] &&
> >>>>>> ARCH_SOCFPGA [=y]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is this coming from this PR or not ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, this PR.  Top of tree + this PR only.
> >>>
> >>> It's not only top of tree + this PR, it also fails for pure
> >>> u-boot-socfpga/master.
> >>>
> >>> Seems like this bug has been introduced when I made the gen5 driver
> >>> depend
> >>> on RAM. Unfortunately, all the drivers use one Kconfig item (although
> >>> these
> >>> are totally different drivers) but now only gen5 depends on RAM. Is
> >>> there
> >>> any Kconfig magic to fix this without duplicating the config item
> >>> entries?
> >>
> >> I think you may want something more like:
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> >> index 04a207c9403e..4a23e327dfb4 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> >> @@ -821,14 +821,12 @@ config ARCH_SOCFPGA
> >>       select DM_SERIAL
> >>       select ENABLE_ARM_SOC_BOOT0_HOOK if TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 ||
> >> TARGET_SOCFPGA_ARRIA10
> >>       select OF_CONTROL
> >> -    select RAM if TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5
> >>       select SPL_DM_RESET if DM_RESET
> >>       select SPL_DM_SERIAL
> >>       select SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT
> >>       select SPL_LIBGENERIC_SUPPORT
> >>       select SPL_NAND_SUPPORT if SPL_NAND_DENALI
> >>       select SPL_OF_CONTROL
> >> -    select SPL_RAM if TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5
> >>       select SPL_SEPARATE_BSS if TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10
> >>       select SPL_SERIAL_SUPPORT
> >>       select SPL_WATCHDOG_SUPPORT
> >> diff --git a/drivers/ddr/altera/Kconfig b/drivers/ddr/altera/Kconfig
> >> index 7370d4133a67..8f60b56eb848 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/ddr/altera/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/drivers/ddr/altera/Kconfig
> >> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> >>   config ALTERA_SDRAM
> >>       bool "SoCFPGA DDR SDRAM driver"
> >> -    depends on RAM
> >>       depends on TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 || TARGET_SOCFPGA_ARRIA10
> >> +    select RAM if TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5
> >> +    select SPL_RAM if TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5
> >>       help
> >>         Enable DDR SDRAM controller for the SoCFPGA devices.
> >>
> >> But I didn't test anything other than socfpga_arria10/arria5 as
> >> building.
> >
> > Tom,
> > Thanks for the hint. I did just that and it works for me (cyclone5).
> > As only this platform is affected by this patch, it should be fine.
> >
> > Marek,
> > how should we proceed? I pushed the change as suggested by Tom to:
> >
> > https://github.com/goldsimon/u-boot.git
> >
> > or I could send v5 of the series that broke arria10...?
>
> Send me a single patch on top of u-boot-socfpga/master, I'll add it and
> that should take care of it. It would also make things well documented
> for other people who run into this.
>

To make it clear, patch 6/12 of this PR is ok for gen5 but breaks arria10.
This is not something anyone could run into as it's new. I'd rather fix the
patches before merging them to master (keep things bisectable for a10).

Unfortunately, I'll be more or less offline until Tuesday. If my github
branch isn't enough, I'll send something when I'm back with PC access.

Regards,
Simo,

>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list