[U-Boot] [PULL] u-boot-socfpga/master
Simon Goldschmidt
simon.k.r.goldschmidt at gmail.com
Tue Apr 16 20:08:51 UTC 2019
Hi Marek,
Am 12.04.2019 um 12:31 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> On 4/11/19 10:07 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>
>>
>> Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de <mailto:marex at denx.de>> schrieb am Do., 11.
>> Apr. 2019, 21:59:
>>
>> On 4/11/19 9:30 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 11.04.19 21:03, Tom Rini wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 08:49:38PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 11.04.19 20:20, Tom Rini wrote:
>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 08:19:38PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> >>>>> On 4/11/19 8:17 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 04:46:28PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> The following changes since commit
>> >>>>>>> 3c99166441bf3ea325af2da83cfe65430b49c066:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Prepare v2019.04 (2019-04-08 21:40:40 -0400)
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> are available in the Git repository at:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> git://git.denx.de/u-boot-socfpga.git
>> <http://git.denx.de/u-boot-socfpga.git> master
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> for you to fetch changes up to
>> >>>>>>> ef8679b24ec6226b7198e06747ff047a16030ca4:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> arm: dts: Stratix10: Add QSPI node (2019-04-09 13:11:06
>> +0200)
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Arg, sorry I didn't see this sooner:
>> >>>>>> arm: w+ socfpga_arria10
>> >>>>>> +(socfpga_arria10)
>> >>>>>> +(socfpga_arria10) WARNING: unmet direct dependencies
>> detected for
>> >>>>>> ALTERA_SDRAM
>> >>>>>> +(socfpga_arria10) Depends on [n]: RAM [=n] &&
>> >>>>>> (TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 [=n] || TARGET_SOCFPGA_ARRIA10 [=y])
>> >>>>>> +(socfpga_arria10) Selected by [y]:
>> >>>>>> +(socfpga_arria10) - TARGET_SOCFPGA_ARRIA10 [=y] && ARM [=y] &&
>> >>>>>> ARCH_SOCFPGA [=y]
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Is this coming from this PR or not ?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Yes, this PR. Top of tree + this PR only.
>> >>>
>> >>> It's not only top of tree + this PR, it also fails for pure
>> >>> u-boot-socfpga/master.
>> >>>
>> >>> Seems like this bug has been introduced when I made the gen5 driver
>> >>> depend
>> >>> on RAM. Unfortunately, all the drivers use one Kconfig item
>> (although
>> >>> these
>> >>> are totally different drivers) but now only gen5 depends on RAM. Is
>> >>> there
>> >>> any Kconfig magic to fix this without duplicating the config item
>> >>> entries?
>> >>
>> >> I think you may want something more like:
>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> >> index 04a207c9403e..4a23e327dfb4 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> >> @@ -821,14 +821,12 @@ config ARCH_SOCFPGA
>> >> select DM_SERIAL
>> >> select ENABLE_ARM_SOC_BOOT0_HOOK if TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 ||
>> >> TARGET_SOCFPGA_ARRIA10
>> >> select OF_CONTROL
>> >> - select RAM if TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5
>> >> select SPL_DM_RESET if DM_RESET
>> >> select SPL_DM_SERIAL
>> >> select SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT
>> >> select SPL_LIBGENERIC_SUPPORT
>> >> select SPL_NAND_SUPPORT if SPL_NAND_DENALI
>> >> select SPL_OF_CONTROL
>> >> - select SPL_RAM if TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5
>> >> select SPL_SEPARATE_BSS if TARGET_SOCFPGA_STRATIX10
>> >> select SPL_SERIAL_SUPPORT
>> >> select SPL_WATCHDOG_SUPPORT
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/ddr/altera/Kconfig b/drivers/ddr/altera/Kconfig
>> >> index 7370d4133a67..8f60b56eb848 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/ddr/altera/Kconfig
>> >> +++ b/drivers/ddr/altera/Kconfig
>> >> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>> >> config ALTERA_SDRAM
>> >> bool "SoCFPGA DDR SDRAM driver"
>> >> - depends on RAM
>> >> depends on TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5 || TARGET_SOCFPGA_ARRIA10
>> >> + select RAM if TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5
>> >> + select SPL_RAM if TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5
>> >> help
>> >> Enable DDR SDRAM controller for the SoCFPGA devices.
>> >>
>> >> But I didn't test anything other than socfpga_arria10/arria5 as
>> >> building.
>> >
>> > Tom,
>> > Thanks for the hint. I did just that and it works for me (cyclone5).
>> > As only this platform is affected by this patch, it should be fine.
>> >
>> > Marek,
>> > how should we proceed? I pushed the change as suggested by Tom to:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/goldsimon/u-boot.git
>> >
>> > or I could send v5 of the series that broke arria10...?
>>
>> Send me a single patch on top of u-boot-socfpga/master, I'll add it and
>> that should take care of it. It would also make things well documented
>> for other people who run into this.
>>
>>
>> To make it clear, patch 6/12 of this PR is ok for gen5 but breaks
>> arria10. This is not something anyone could run into as it's new. I'd
>> rather fix the patches before merging them to master (keep things
>> bisectable for a10).
>>
>> Unfortunately, I'll be more or less offline until Tuesday. If my github
>> branch isn't enough, I'll send something when I'm back with PC access.
>
> I can squash the patch(es), that's fine. I just need the patch posted to
> the ML.
Ok, I'm back online. I've just sent the updated patch to fix the build
issue to the ML (see https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1086623/). This
one is meant as replacement for 82b40a096410 in current
u-boot-socfpga/master.
Let me know if there's anything else missing. Once this is applied, I'll
prepare a PR for the next batch.
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list