[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/4] configs: rk3288: Tinker Board SPL file must fit into 32 KiB

[Simon Goldschmidt]

On 22.04.19 21:29, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 08:40:52PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>> Am 22.04.2019 um 16:36 schrieb Tom Rini:
>>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:12:36PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>>> Heinrich,
>>>>
>>>> On 02.04.19 19:19, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>>> The SPL image for the Tinker Board has to fit into 32 KiB. This includes
>>>>> up to 2 KiB for the file header.
>>>>>
>>>>> A new configuration variable CONFIG_SPL_SIZE_LIMIT is introduced to define
>>>>> the board specific limit.
>>>>>
>>>>> A common Makefile function is used for this test and the test against
>>>>> CONFIG_BOARD_SIZE_LIMIT.
>>>>>
>>>>> Move the board size check from arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile to Makefile.
>>>>
>>>> Has anything from this series been applied? I now have a working patch that
>>>> applies on top of this and adds a full SPL SRAM size check (including HEAP,
>>>> GD and stack; via a host tool) which works for socfpga (as an example of a
>>>> platform where SPL binary is loaded to limited SRAM).
>>>>
>>>> Actually, my patch would replace your patch 3/4 but build on 1/4 (2/4 and
>>>> 4/4 are arch-specific).
>>>>
>>>> How should we proceed here? I could send a series including your 1/4, or I
>>>> could send a series completely building on this series, at the downside of
>>>> more or less reverting your 2/4.
>>>
>>> What I would like to see is i.MX (and rockchip) converted to use your
>>> new test as well (also, yay!  Thanks for following up on that!) and we
>>> drop the existing check here.
>>
>> Ok, so while I cannot really help on i.MX and rockchip, why don't you accept
>> this series from Heinrich and I'll send my patch as followup? Then we can
>> discuss this with i.MX and rockchip maintainers.
> 
> Can you post your series now, and we can move from there?  Thanks!

Did that:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1088865/
[Depends on this series from Heinrich]

Regards,
Simon