[U-Boot] fit: Add support for printing more than one FPGA node name

[Chee, Tien Fong]

On Mon, 2019-04-22 at 13:29 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 08:32:24PM +0800, tien.fong.chee at intel.com
> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > From: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.chee at intel.com>
> > 
> > This would print out all the FPGA node names setting to fpga
> > property.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.chee at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  common/image-fit.c |   14 +++++++++++---
> >  1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/common/image-fit.c b/common/image-fit.c
> > index ac901e1..816e17d 100644
> > --- a/common/image-fit.c
> > +++ b/common/image-fit.c
> > @@ -263,6 +263,7 @@ static void fit_conf_print(const void *fit, int
> > noffset, const char *p)
> >  	int ret;
> >  	int fdt_index, loadables_index;
> >  	int ndepth;
> > +	ulong count;
> >  
> >  	/* Mandatory properties */
> >  	ret = fit_get_desc(fit, noffset, &desc);
> > @@ -299,9 +300,16 @@ static void fit_conf_print(const void *fit,
> > int noffset, const char *p)
> >  		printf("%s\n", uname);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	uname = fdt_getprop(fit, noffset, FIT_FPGA_PROP, NULL);
> > -	if (uname)
> > -		printf("%s  FPGA:         %s\n", p, uname);
> > +	count = fit_conf_get_prop_node_count(fit, noffset,
> > FIT_FPGA_PROP);
> > +
> > +	for (ndepth = 0; ndepth < count; ndepth++) {
> > +		int images_noffset =
> > fit_conf_get_prop_node_index(fit, noffset,
> > +						FIT_FPGA_PROP,
> > ndepth);
> > +		uname = fit_get_name(fit, images_noffset, NULL);
> > +
> > +		if (uname)
> > +			printf("%s  FPGA:         %s\n", p,
> > uname);
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	/* Print out all of the specified loadables */
> >  	for (loadables_index = 0;
> While I'm fine with the conceptual change here, both
> fit_conf_get_prop_node_count / fit_conf_get_prop_node_index are
> defined
> later in the file and while public functions not documented in a
> header.
> Can you please do a patch that does so first, as we otherwise get a
> warning?  Thanks!
The header file in this patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/105828
9/ , unfortunately the review taking a bit longer than what i expected.

I would update you once the whole series patches are accepted.

Thanks a lot.
>