[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 06/13] rockchip: rk3399: Add Orangepi RK3399 support

Paul Kocialkowski paul.kocialkowski at bootlin.com
Fri Apr 26 15:12:21 UTC 2019


Hi,

On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 20:31 +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 8:24 PM Paul Kocialkowski
> <paul.kocialkowski at bootlin.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 20:15 +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 8:04 PM Paul Kocialkowski
> > > <paul.kocialkowski at bootlin.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 19:57 +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 7:47 PM Paul Kocialkowski
> > > > > <paul.kocialkowski at bootlin.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Thu, 2019-04-25 at 23:04 +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > > > > > Add initial support for Orangepi RK3399 board.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Specification
> > > > > > > - Rockchip RK3399
> > > > > > > - 2GB/4GB DDR3
> > > > > > > - 16GB eMMC
> > > > > > > - SD card slot
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Looks like you're missing u-boot,dm-pre-reloc to have it working, which
> > > > > > will need to be introduced when moving to rk3399-u-boot.dtsi.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Look like you are confused or doesn't check the patch. This patch have
> > > > > rk3399-orangepi-u-boot.dtsi which included rk3399-u-boot.dtsi that has
> > > > > u-boot,dm-pre-reloc for sdmmc.
> > > > 
> > > > Well no, in your v3.1 patch, you no longer have u-boot,dm-pre-reloc in
> > > > rk3399-u-boot.dtsi, so you need to add it in the device dts and remove
> > > > it in your second series when you add it back to rk3399-u-boot.dtsi.
> > > 
> > > Which u-boot,dm-pre-reloc are you taking about?
> > > 
> > > v3.1 has u-boot,dm-pre-reloc for sdmmc, please check it again [1]
> > > which were used by subsequent boards on the same series.
> > > 
> > > The diff between v3 vs v3.1 is like v3 removed u-boot,dm-pre-reloc on
> > > existing board dts files thought that it will include
> > > rk3399-u-boot.dtsi will automatically, but not ie fixed in v3.1
> > > 
> > > > It's not okay to submit the board with broken MMC support and fix it in
> > > > a subsequent series.
> > > 
> > > Again, nothing broken. existing boards or dts(i) files are untouched.
> > > Added only initial rk3399-u-boot.dtsi with sdmmc u-boot,dm-pre-reloc
> > > node to make use of new boards.  and the same reused by next series
> > > so-that I can add binman global to all rk3399 boards.
> > 
> > Okay I think I'm getting there. So the Orangepi uses the new scheme
> > (including rk3399-u-boot.dtsi which has u-boot,dm-pre-reloc) while all
> > other boards are still using the previous scheme after the series.
> > 
> > This is very confusing and I really think you should keep u-boot,dm-
> > pre-reloc in the orange pi dts file and then make the transition with
> > all the other boards. You're mixing multiple logical steps which makes
> > it really hard to understand what's going on.
> > 
> > More to that, introducing the rk3399-u-boot.dtsi is a logical step that
> > should be grouped with your second series, not the first one. In your
> > first series, boards have u-boot,dm-pre-reloc in their per-device dtsi.
> > 
> > Could you respin the two series to group changes by logic changes
> > instead of the current state of interleaved changes?
> 
> Okay, to make it clear I can send v4 with v3.1 included and updated
> commit log. but I the new series about binman remains same since the
> changes on first patch on the series are relevant.

I think it makes no sense to introduce rk3399-u-boot.dts as part of the
series currently in v3. You need to remove the patch (currently v3.1)
from this series and group it with the new series (binman-related).

Otherwise, you're mixing two unrelated logical changes across two
series.

Cheers,

Paul

-- 
Paul Kocialkowski, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com



More information about the U-Boot mailing list