[U-Boot] [PATCH] board_r: re-order the board_early_init_r()
Matthias Brugger
matthias.bgg at gmail.com
Thu Aug 1 16:40:30 UTC 2019
On 31/07/2019 10:58, Kever Yang wrote:
>
> On 2019/7/31 下午3:23, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>> On 24/07/2019 14:22, Kever Yang wrote:
>>> On 2019/7/24 下午6:22, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:01 PM Kever Yang <kever.yang at rock-chips.com> wrote:
>>>>> The board_early_init_r() suppose to be called before board_init(),
>>>>> then the board callback functions in board_r will be:
>>>>> - board_early_init_r()
>>>>> - board_init()
>>>>> - board_late_init()
>>>> Searching through the code, elixir.bootlin.com gives me 52 definitions
>>>> of board_early_init_r(). Does this patch break any of those boards
>>>> when it changes the order of those calls?
>>> I do have check some of the implement and most of them should be OK, but to be
>>> honest,
>>>
>>> I'm don't have any of those boards, and not sure if this break any of them, and
>>> I'm not sure
>>>
>>> if people using this interface have notice it's after the board_init().
>>>
>>> When I try to use this board_early_init_r(), I thought this is before
>>> board_init(), but it actually
>>>
>>> after the board_init(), that make people confusing.
>>>
>>> I think the _early_ one should be at the first, isn't it?
>> I agree. Maybe we should rename it to board_post_init?
> Sorry , do you mean add/rename a board_post_init() for what's done by
> board_early_init_r() now and then add/move ad board api before board_init()?
> There is a board_late_init(), which is after env init, a new board_post_init()
> seems
> not a good idea.
>
My idea was to rename board_early_init_r to board_post_init as it is done after
board_init but before board_late_init. It's not perfect but at least less
confusing then the naming right now.
Regards,
Matthias
>
> Here is the Kconfig help for BOARD_EARLY_INIT_R, which also means we it should
> be called before board_init().
>
> config BOARD_EARLY_INIT_R
> bool "Call board-specific init after relocation"
> help
> Some boards need to perform initialisation as directly after
> relocation. With this option, U-Boot calls board_early_init_r()
> in the post-relocation init sequence.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Kever
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
>>
>
>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list