[U-Boot] buildman rockchip

[Tom Rini]

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 09:32:29AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Kever,
> 
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 at 21:03, Kever Yang <kever.yang at rock-chips.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > On 2019/7/28 下午11:20, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Kever,
> > >
> > > On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 at 08:12, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> > >> HI Kever,
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 at 05:14, Kever Yang <kever.yang at rock-chips.com> wrote:
> > >>> Hi Simon,
> > >>>
> > >>>       When I'm using the buildman for rockchip platform, it's always
> > >>> build only 20 boards,
> > >>>
> > >>> and many boards are not build, there are 38 boards with its defconfig in
> > >>> configs/ dir,
> > >>>
> > >>> could you help to check what's missing?
> > >> I think I commented on this at the time of the patches to move away
> > >> from arch-rockchip. There are now separate arch directories for each
> > >> soc. Most of them don't mention rockchip at all. See boards.cfg for
> > >> the resulting output.
> >
> > There is no Kconfig string option for SoC vendor now, is it possible to
> > add info by Kconfig option
> >
> > which is able to identify the SoC vendor into boards.cfg? eg. There is a
> > CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP
> >
> > for rockchip platform, and the 'CONFIG_ARCH_' seems also use for many
> > other platform.
> >
> >
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> See build log:
> > >>>
> > >>> https://travis-ci.org/keveryang/u-boot/jobs/564525467
> > > One more thing...to check what builds will be built try -nv :
> > >
> > > buildman -nv rockchip
> > >
> > > This will list the boards. You could use 'rk' instead of 'rockchip', perhaps?
> >
> >
> > Use 'rk' + 'rv' is OK to get all 38 boards for now, there might have
> > SoCs leading with 'px' which will mix
> >
> > with other SoC vendors.
> 
> Well, the only thing I can think oi is going back to the SoC being
> rockchip. Or maybe add a new thing to boards.cfg?

Part of the problem is that yes, what exactly IS the common string
between all rockchip-the-SoC-vendor platforms that will catch the
various SoCs as well as non-rockchip-the-board-producer platforms?

All that said, we shouldn't add more to boards.cfg we should make
buildman consume/generate the db?  May save us needing to convert
genboardscfg.py to python3 :)

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20190802/f4d90ac4/attachment.sig>